Savolainen Jukka, Paananen Reija, Merikukka Marko, Aaltonen Mikko, Gissler Mika
School of Criminology, University of Nebraska, USA.
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Adv Life Course Res. 2013 Sep;18(3):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
Research on social class and crime is dominated by perspectives that assume socioeconomic disadvantage to exert causal influence on offending. As an alternative approach, the present study examined hypotheses derived from a social selection perspective which treats intergenerational continuity in antisocial propensity as the primary source of socioeconomic differences in criminal activity. Under this theory, individual characteristics of the parents influence their personal socioeconomic attainment as well as the behavioral traits they pass on to their children. Consistent with both of these perspectives, longitudinal data tracking Finnish males born in 1987 (n=21,513) showed strong negative associations between family socioeconomic status (SES) and offspring rates of criminal offending. In critical support for the selection perspective: (1) these association were linear rather than discrete, (2) parents' educational attainment accounted for most of the association between the occupational measure of family SES and crime, and (3) measures of offspring criminal propensity mediated a substantial share of these effects. Adolescent educational marginalization emerged as the key factor linking childhood socioeconomic status to the risk of criminal offending in emerging adulthood. We discuss the implications of this finding for social influence and social selection models of explanation.
关于社会阶层与犯罪的研究主要受一些观点主导,这些观点认为社会经济劣势对犯罪行为具有因果影响。作为一种替代方法,本研究检验了源自社会选择视角的假设,该视角将反社会倾向的代际连续性视为犯罪活动中社会经济差异的主要来源。根据这一理论,父母的个人特征会影响他们自身的社会经济成就以及他们传递给子女的行为特征。与这两种观点一致的是,对1987年出生的芬兰男性(n = 21,513)进行追踪的纵向数据显示,家庭社会经济地位(SES)与子女犯罪率之间存在强烈的负相关。对选择视角的关键支持在于:(1)这些关联是线性的而非离散的;(2)父母的教育程度在家庭SES的职业衡量指标与犯罪之间的关联中占了大部分;(3)子女犯罪倾向的衡量指标在这些影响中占了很大一部分。青少年教育边缘化成为将童年社会经济地位与成年早期犯罪风险联系起来的关键因素。我们讨论了这一发现对社会影响和社会选择解释模型的意义。