Tavtigian Sean V, Chenevix-Trench Georgia
Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Biomark Med. 2014;8(4):589-603. doi: 10.2217/bmm.13.143.
Most cancer susceptibility genes function as tumor suppressors; accordingly, the focus of mutation screening in breast cancer families has been to identify protein-truncating mutations. However, it is now clear that, for some breast cancer susceptibility genes, a significant proportion of the burden of disease comes from rare missense substitutions. Among genes that have been extensively evaluated, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and BRIP1 stand as examples where the majority of mutations lead to protein truncation;TP53 provides a counter example, where the majority of pathogenic variants are missense substitutions. In ATM and CHEK2, missense substitutions are probably equally or more important in terms of their frequency and attributable risk. Therefore, ongoing efforts to identify new susceptibility genes should not ignore missense variation.
大多数癌症易感基因发挥肿瘤抑制作用;因此,乳腺癌家族中突变筛查的重点一直是识别导致蛋白质截短的突变。然而,现在很清楚的是,对于某些乳腺癌易感基因,相当一部分疾病负担来自罕见的错义替代。在经过广泛评估的基因中,BRCA1、BRCA2、PALB2和BRIP1就是例子,其中大多数突变会导致蛋白质截短;TP53则是一个反例,其中大多数致病变异是错义替代。在ATM和CHEK2中,就其发生频率和归因风险而言,错义替代可能同样重要或更重要。因此,正在进行的识别新易感基因的工作不应忽视错义变异。