Leong Samuel C, Lesser Tristram H
The Skull Base Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, U.K.
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):503-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000428.
The aim of this survey was to objectively quantify the impact of facial palsy on the quality of life of acoustic neuroma patients.
The Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale was emailed to all members of the British Acoustic Neuroma Association (BANA).
Of the 880 BANA members contacted, 398 (45.2%) responded, of which, 178 indicated that they had facial paralysis. Surgery for acoustic neuroma accounted for 80% of facial paralysis. Treatment received for facial palsy varied considerably, although 33% reported not receiving any treatment. The commonest single treatment modality wads facial electrical stimulation (41%), followed by facial physiotherapy (39%). The most common surgical procedures were to the eye lid (50%), followed by nerve graft (12%), forehead lift (10%), muscle sling (9%), and face lift (9%). The overall mean total FaCE Scale score was 54.8 (range, 10-100, standard deviation [SD] 21.2). Both facial movement and eye comfort domains had the lowest mean scores of 41.3 (SD, 29.9) and 41.2 (SD 32.6) respectively. The mean total FaCE Scale score of female respondents was statistically lower (p = 0.03) than males (52.6 (SD 21.2) versus 58.8 (SD 20.7) respectively), as were the difference in mean domain scores for facial comfort, eye comfort and social function. The mean total FaCE Scale scores of respondents aged below 40 years were the lowest. Younger patients had the lowest social function domain scores of all age groups.
Facial paralysis is a significant problem in patients with acoustic neuroma. Based on this survey, treatment for facial paralysis is often not offered and even when given, still leaves the patient with a significantly lowered quality of life. However, it should be remembered that this study has surveyed a skewed patient population and that overall, most acoustic neuroma patients do not suffer with facial paralysis.
本调查旨在客观量化面瘫对听神经瘤患者生活质量的影响。
将面部临床测量评估(FaCE)量表通过电子邮件发送给英国听神经瘤协会(BANA)的所有成员。
在联系的880名BANA成员中,398人(45.2%)回复,其中178人表示有面瘫。听神经瘤手术导致的面瘫占80%。面瘫接受的治疗差异很大,尽管33%的人报告未接受任何治疗。最常见的单一治疗方式是面部电刺激(41%),其次是面部物理治疗(39%)。最常见的外科手术是眼睑手术(50%),其次是神经移植(12%)、前额提升术(10%)、肌肉悬吊术(9%)和面部提升术(9%)。FaCE量表的总体平均总分是54.8(范围10 - 100,标准差[SD]21.2)。面部运动和眼部舒适度领域的平均得分最低,分别为41.3(SD 29.9)和41.2(SD 32.6)。女性受访者的FaCE量表总体平均得分在统计学上低于男性(分别为52.6(SD 21.2)和58.8(SD 20.7)),面部舒适度、眼部舒适度和社交功能领域的平均得分差异也是如此。40岁以下受访者的FaCE量表总体平均得分最低。在所有年龄组中,年轻患者的社交功能领域得分最低。
面瘫是听神经瘤患者的一个重要问题。基于本次调查,面瘫治疗往往未得到提供,即使给予治疗,患者的生活质量仍会显著降低。然而,应记住本研究调查的是一个有偏差的患者群体,总体而言,大多数听神经瘤患者不会患面瘫。