Suppr超能文献

通过三种不同检测方法进行血小板抗体分析。

Platelet antibody analysis by three different tests.

作者信息

Sareban Nazanin, Macher Susanne, Drexler Camilla, Posch Ursula, Lanzer Gerhard, Schallmoser Katharina

机构信息

Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2015 May;29(3):198-202. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21750. Epub 2014 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platelet-reactive antibodies lead to thrombocytopenia and bleeding disorders, and diverse assays are used for their detection. In this retrospective analysis, the applicability of three different test systems was compared and antibody specificities were assessed.

METHODS

Sera of 1,234 patients were tested with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Lifecodes PAKPLUS(®) or PAK 12(®), Gen-Probe) and a solid-phase assay (Capture-P Ready Screen(®), Immucor Inc.). In cases of suspected anti-HLA class I antibodies, a specific lymphocytotoxicity test (LCT, Bio-Rad(®)) was performed.

RESULTS

Platelet antibodies were detected in 366 of 1,234 samples (29.7%). In 70.3% concordant negative but only in 8.4% concordant positive results were obtained with both the methods; 185 of 1,053 in the solid-phase assay negative samples were positive in the ELISA (15.0%). In samples positive in both methods, most antibodies reacted against HLA class I antigens. Glycoprotein (GP) specific platelet antibodies, mainly against GPIIb/IIIa and GPIa/IIa, were more frequently detectable in the ELISA than in the solid-phase assay, whereas weakly positive results have to be interpreted cautiously.

CONCLUSION

ELISA, solid-phase assay, and LCT showed highly divergent results. Due to several limitations, the additional analysis by the "monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigen" (MAIPA)-assay is highly recommended.

摘要

背景

血小板反应性抗体可导致血小板减少和出血性疾病,检测此类抗体的方法多种多样。在本回顾性分析中,比较了三种不同检测系统的适用性,并评估了抗体特异性。

方法

采用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA;Lifecodes PAKPLUS® 或 PAK 12®,Gen-Probe)和固相测定法(Capture-P Ready Screen®,Immucor Inc.)检测1234例患者的血清。对于疑似抗I类人白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体的病例,进行特异性淋巴细胞毒性试验(LCT,Bio-Rad®)。

结果

1234份样本中有366份(29.7%)检测到血小板抗体。两种方法的结果在70.3%的样本中呈一致阴性,但仅在8.4%的样本中呈一致阳性;固相测定法的1053份阴性样本中有185份在ELISA中呈阳性(15.0%)。在两种方法均为阳性的样本中,大多数抗体与I类HLA抗原发生反应。糖蛋白(GP)特异性血小板抗体,主要是针对GPIIb/IIIa和GPIa/IIa的抗体,在ELISA中比在固相测定法中更易检测到,而弱阳性结果的解读需谨慎。

结论

ELISA、固相测定法和LCT的结果差异很大。由于存在若干局限性,强烈建议通过“血小板抗原单克隆抗体特异性固定”(MAIPA)测定法进行额外分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验