Gasbarre Consulting, United States.
Vet Parasitol. 2014 Jul 30;204(1-2):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
The first documented case of macrocyclic lactone resistance in gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes of cattle was seen in the US approximately 10 years ago. Since that time the increase incidence of anthelmintic resistance has continued at an alarming rate. Currently parasites of the genera Cooperia and/or Haemonchus resistant to generic or brand-name macrocyclic lactones have be demonstrated in more than half of all operations examined. Both of these parasite genera are capable of causing economic losses by decreasing food intake and subsequently animal productivity. Currently, there are no easy and quick means to detect anthelmintic resistant GI nematodes. Definitive identification requires killing of cattle. The most commonly used field detection method is the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). This method can be adapted for use as a screening agent for Veterinarians and producers to identify less than desired clearance of the parasites after anthelmintic treatment. Further studies can then define the reasons for persistence of the egg counts. The appearance of anthelmintic resistance is largely due to the development of very effective nematode control programs that have significantly improved the productivity of the US cattle industry, but at the same time has placed a high level of selective pressure on the parasite genome. The challenges ahead include the development of programs that control the anthelmintic resistant nematodes but at the same time result in more sustainable parasite control. The goal is to maintain high levels of productivity but to exert less selective pressures on the parasites. One of the most effective means to slow the development of drug resistance is through the simultaneous use of multiple classes of anthelmintics, each of which has a different mode of action. Reduction of the selective pressure on the parasites can be attained through a more targeted approach to drug treatments where the producer's needs are met by selective treatment of different classes of animals and not by blanket treatment at a location. The implementation of such programs will vary by the sector of the industry and the individual site. In general, the feedlot will be the easiest sector for developing of programs, while stocker/backgrounder operations will provide the most challenging problems. A major question that must be addressed is whether it is important that parasite control programs to be sustainable over time, or if the pharmaceutical industry develop new control agents at a rate sufficient to render sustainability unimportant.
大约 10 年前,美国首次记录到牛胃肠道线虫对大环内酯类驱虫药的耐药性。从那时起,驱虫药耐药性的发生率以惊人的速度持续增加。目前,在检查的一半以上的养殖场中,都发现了对通用或品牌大环内酯类驱虫药具有耐药性的库珀线虫属和/或仰口线虫属寄生虫。这两种寄生虫都能够通过减少采食量和随后降低动物生产力来造成经济损失。目前,没有简单快捷的方法来检测对大环内酯类驱虫药具有耐药性的胃肠道线虫。明确的鉴定需要杀死牛。最常用的现场检测方法是粪便虫卵减少试验(FECRT)。这种方法可以适用于兽医和生产者作为筛选剂,以确定驱虫药治疗后寄生虫清除不理想。然后可以进一步研究确定卵计数持续存在的原因。驱虫药耐药性的出现主要是由于制定了非常有效的线虫控制计划,这些计划显著提高了美国养牛业的生产力,但同时也对寄生虫基因组施加了很高的选择压力。未来的挑战包括制定控制驱虫药耐药性线虫的计划,但同时又能实现更可持续的寄生虫控制。目标是保持高水平的生产力,但对寄生虫施加的选择压力更小。减缓耐药性发展的最有效方法之一是同时使用多种类别的驱虫药,每种驱虫药的作用模式都不同。通过更有针对性的药物治疗方法,可以降低寄生虫的选择压力,在这种方法中,生产者的需求通过对不同类别的动物进行选择性治疗来满足,而不是在一个地点进行全面治疗。此类计划的实施将因行业部门和个别地点而异。一般来说,饲养场将是开发计划最容易的部门,而育肥/后备牛场将提供最具挑战性的问题。必须解决的一个主要问题是,寄生虫控制计划是否需要随着时间的推移保持可持续性,或者制药行业是否需要以足够快的速度开发新的控制剂,以使可持续性变得不重要。