Suppr超能文献

从患者到合作伙伴:生物医学研究中的以参与者为中心的举措。

From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.

机构信息

HeLEX, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

出版信息

Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.

Abstract

Advances in computing technology and bioinformatics mean that medical research is increasingly characterized by large international consortia of researchers that are reliant on large data sets and biobanks. These trends raise a number of challenges for obtaining consent, protecting participant privacy concerns and maintaining public trust. Participant-centred initiatives (PCIs) use social media technologies to address these immediate concerns, but they also provide the basis for long-term interactive partnerships. Here, we give an overview of this rapidly moving field by providing an analysis of the different PCI approaches, as well as the benefits and challenges of implementing PCIs.

摘要

计算技术和生物信息学的进步意味着,医学研究越来越具有大型国际研究人员联盟的特点,这些联盟依赖于大型数据集和生物库。这些趋势给获得同意、保护参与者隐私问题和维护公众信任带来了一些挑战。以参与者为中心的举措(PCIs)利用社交媒体技术来解决这些紧迫的问题,但它们也为长期的互动伙伴关系提供了基础。在这里,我们通过分析不同的 PCI 方法,以及实施 PCI 的好处和挑战,概述了这个快速发展的领域。

相似文献

3
Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations.社交媒体研究的伦理:常见问题与实际考量。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Sep;16(9):708-13. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0334. Epub 2013 May 16.
4
Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem.基因、细胞与生物样本库:没错,同意问题依然存在。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jul 25;15(7):e2002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002654. eCollection 2017 Jul.
6
Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.重新思考生物库研究中同意的价值。
Bioethics. 2011 Mar;25(3):155-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01749.x.

引用本文的文献

8
Who owns (or controls) health data?谁拥有(或控制)健康数据?
Sci Data. 2024 Feb 1;11(1):156. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-02982-1.

本文引用的文献

1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验