• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从患者到合作伙伴:生物医学研究中的以参与者为中心的举措。

From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.

机构信息

HeLEX, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK.

出版信息

Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.

DOI:10.1038/nrg3218
PMID:22473380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3806497/
Abstract

Advances in computing technology and bioinformatics mean that medical research is increasingly characterized by large international consortia of researchers that are reliant on large data sets and biobanks. These trends raise a number of challenges for obtaining consent, protecting participant privacy concerns and maintaining public trust. Participant-centred initiatives (PCIs) use social media technologies to address these immediate concerns, but they also provide the basis for long-term interactive partnerships. Here, we give an overview of this rapidly moving field by providing an analysis of the different PCI approaches, as well as the benefits and challenges of implementing PCIs.

摘要

计算技术和生物信息学的进步意味着,医学研究越来越具有大型国际研究人员联盟的特点,这些联盟依赖于大型数据集和生物库。这些趋势给获得同意、保护参与者隐私问题和维护公众信任带来了一些挑战。以参与者为中心的举措(PCIs)利用社交媒体技术来解决这些紧迫的问题,但它们也为长期的互动伙伴关系提供了基础。在这里,我们通过分析不同的 PCI 方法,以及实施 PCI 的好处和挑战,概述了这个快速发展的领域。

相似文献

1
From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.从患者到合作伙伴:生物医学研究中的以参与者为中心的举措。
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Apr 3;13(5):371-6. doi: 10.1038/nrg3218.
2
Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.生物样本库中的知情同意与研究治理:来自与医学研究人员焦点小组的证据
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):232-42. doi: 10.1159/000336544. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
3
Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations.社交媒体研究的伦理:常见问题与实际考量。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Sep;16(9):708-13. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0334. Epub 2013 May 16.
4
Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem.基因、细胞与生物样本库:没错,同意问题依然存在。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jul 25;15(7):e2002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002654. eCollection 2017 Jul.
5
Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.公众对生物样本库研究中的知情同意和数据共享的态度:美国一项大型多地点实验性调查
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):414-427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.重新思考生物库研究中同意的价值。
Bioethics. 2011 Mar;25(3):155-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01749.x.
7
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms to Locate and Track Research Participants.社交媒体平台用于寻找和跟踪研究参与者的伦理和监管考虑因素。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(6):47-61. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1602176.
8
Ethical issues when using social media for health outside professional relationships.在职业关系之外利用社交媒体促进健康时的伦理问题。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;27(2):97-105. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.1001726. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
9
Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.父母对生物样本库中同意和数据共享的态度:一项多地点实验性调查。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):128-142. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1505783. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Reporting of Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research Utilizing Social Media Data on Public Health Care: Scoping Review.报告利用社交媒体数据进行公共医疗保健定性研究中的伦理考虑:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 17;26:e51496. doi: 10.2196/51496.

引用本文的文献

1
Enabling secure and self determined health data sharing and consent management.实现安全且自主的健康数据共享和同意管理。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 30;8(1):560. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01945-z.
2
Research Participants' Engagement and Retention in Digital Health Interventions Research: Protocol for Mixed Methods Systematic Review.数字健康干预研究中研究参与者的参与度与留存率:混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 3;14:e65099. doi: 10.2196/65099.
3
Data protection legislation in Africa and pathways for enhancing compliance in big data health research.非洲的数据保护立法和加强大数据健康研究合规性的途径。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 15;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01230-7.
4
Distributed management of patient data-sharing informed consents for clinical research.患者数据共享知情同意的分布式管理用于临床研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;180:108956. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108956. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Ethical framework for FACILITATE: a foundation for the return of clinical trial data to participants.促进临床试验数据返还参与者的伦理框架:基础
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 17;11:1408600. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408600. eCollection 2024.
6
Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy.生物样本库更好治理的风险映射:以biobank.cy为例
Front Genet. 2024 Jun 14;15:1397156. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156. eCollection 2024.
7
Introducing dynamic consent for improved trust and privacy in research involving human biological material and associated data in South Africa.在南非,引入动态同意以提高涉及人类生物材料及相关数据的研究中的信任度和隐私保护。
Front Genet. 2024 Apr 3;15:1272924. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1272924. eCollection 2024.
8
Who owns (or controls) health data?谁拥有(或控制)健康数据?
Sci Data. 2024 Feb 1;11(1):156. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-02982-1.
9
Public Preferences for Digital Health Data Sharing: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in 12 European Countries.公众对数字健康数据共享的偏好:12 个欧洲国家的离散选择实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 23;25:e47066. doi: 10.2196/47066.
10
Toward Community-Based Natural Language Processing (CBNLP): Cocreating With Communities.迈向社区自然语言处理(CBNLP):与社区共创。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e48498. doi: 10.2196/48498.

本文引用的文献

1
The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research.基因组学研究中数据共享与隐私保护之间的紧张关系。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012;13:415-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
2
From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance.从单一生物库到国际网络:发展电子政务。
Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
3
Web-based genome-wide association study identifies two novel loci and a substantial genetic component for Parkinson's disease.基于网络的全基因组关联研究鉴定出两个新的帕金森病发病位点和大量遗传因素。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002141. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
4
Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm.利用在线自我报告的患者数据和患者匹配算法加速临床发现。
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):411-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1837. Epub 2011 Apr 24.
5
Electronic consent channels: preserving patient privacy without handcuffing researchers.电子同意渠道:在不束缚研究人员的情况下保护患者隐私。
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Feb 9;3(69):69cm4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002037.
6
Power to the people: participant ownership of clinical trial data.赋予民众权力:让临床试验数据为参与者所有。
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Feb 9;3(69):69cm3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001857.
7
BMA warns against letting patients have access to their electronic records.英国医学协会警告不要让患者访问其电子记录。
BMJ. 2011 Jan 12;342:d206. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d206.
8
Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits.基于网络的、由参与者驱动的研究为常见特征产生了新的遗传关联。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Jun 24;6(6):e1000993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000993.
9
Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.基因组研究和广泛的数据共享:潜在参与者的观点。
Genet Med. 2010 Aug;12(8):486-95. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e38f9e.
10
Patients providing the answers: narrowing the gap in data quality for emergency care.提供答案的患者:缩小急诊护理数据质量的差距。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e34. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032540. Epub 2010 May 27.