The European Parliament proposal for the new EU General Data Protection Regulation may severely restrict European epidemiological research.
作者信息
Nyrén Olof, Stenbeck Magnus, Grönberg Henrik
机构信息
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden,
出版信息
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;29(4):227-30. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9909-0. Epub 2014 May 7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The European Parliament proposal for the new EU General Data Protection Regulation may severely restrict European epidemiological research.欧洲议会关于新的欧盟《通用数据保护条例》的提案可能会严重限制欧洲的流行病学研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;29(4):227-30. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9909-0. Epub 2014 May 7.
2
Directive 95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.欧洲议会和理事会关于个人数据处理及此类数据自由流动方面保护个人的第95/EC号指令。欧洲议会和欧盟理事会。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;27:83-118.
3
A survey of legal issues and gaps in legal coverage in the EC.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1991;1:122-37.
4
Protection of personal data--the European view.个人数据保护——欧洲视角。
J AHIMA. 1998 Mar;69(3):42-4.
5
Patient data and security: an overview.患者数据与安全：概述
Int J Med Inform. 1998 Mar;49(1):19-30. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00006-9.
6
Security measures required for HIPAA privacy.《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私所需的安全措施。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2000 Winter;14(4):5-12.
7
HIPAA and health information privacy rules: almost there.《健康保险流通与责任法案》及健康信息隐私规则：已近尾声。
Health Manag Technol. 2000 Apr;21(4):26, 28, 30-1.
8
Safeguarding health information.保护健康信息。
Health Law Can. 1998 May;18(4):115-7.
9
Standardization strategy from a European perspective.
Int J Med Inform. 1998 Feb;48(1-3):67-70. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00112-3.
10
Healthcare Information Technology.医疗信息技术
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2015 Dec 28:1-80.
引用本文的文献
1
Practices and Attitudes of Bavarian Stakeholders Regarding the Secondary Use of Health Data for Research Purposes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study.巴伐利亚利益相关者在 COVID-19 大流行期间将健康数据用于研究目的的二次使用的实践和态度：定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 27;24(6):e38754. doi: 10.2196/38754.
2
Research under the GDPR - a level playing field for public and private sector research?《欧盟一般数据保护条例》下的研究——公共和私营部门研究的公平竞争环境？
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Mar 1;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00111-z.
3
The challenge of local consent requirements for global critical care databases.全球重症监护数据库面临的地方同意要求挑战。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Feb;45(2):246-248. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5257-y. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
4
Addressing data privacy in matched studies via virtual pooling.通过虚拟池化解决匹配研究中的数据隐私问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0419-0.
5
Finnish experiences of health monitoring: local, regional, and national data sources for policy evaluation.芬兰健康监测经验：用于政策评估的地方、区域和国家数据源
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 29;9:28824. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.28824. eCollection 2016.
6
Ethical aspects of registry-based research in the Nordic countries.北欧国家基于注册库的研究的伦理问题。
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 23;7:491-508. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S90589. eCollection 2015.
7
Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach.医学研究中的大数据与欧盟数据保护法：对同意或匿名化方法的挑战
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jul;24(7):956-60. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.239. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.鹿特丹研究：2016年目标与设计更新
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;30(8):661-708. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0082-x. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
9
Will the trilogue on the EU Data Protection Regulation recognise the importance of health research?欧盟数据保护条例三方会谈会认可健康研究的重要性吗？
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Oct;25(5):757-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv149. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Population attitudes towards research use of health care registries: a population-based survey in Finland.芬兰民众对医疗保健登记系统研究用途的态度：一项基于人群的调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jul 17;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0040-x.
本文引用的文献
1
Cancer registration, public health and the reform of the European data protection framework: Abandoning or improving European public health research?癌症登记、公共卫生与欧洲数据保护框架改革：摒弃还是改进欧洲公共卫生研究？
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jun;51(9):1028-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
2
Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study.儿童 CT 扫描的辐射暴露与随后白血病和脑瘤风险：一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):499-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
3
Risk of cancer after blood transfusion from donors with subclinical cancer: a retrospective cohort study.来自亚临床癌症献血者输血后患癌风险：一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2007 May 19;369(9574):1724-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60779-X.
4
Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: a retrospective cohort study.瑞典湿鼻烟在男性建筑工人中的口服使用与口腔、肺癌和胰腺癌风险：一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2007 Jun 16;369(9578):2015-2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60678-3.
5
A population-based binational register for monitoring long-term outcome and possible disease concordance among blood donors and recipients.一个基于人群的双边登记系统，用于监测献血者和受血者的长期结局以及可能的疾病一致性。
Vox Sang. 2006 Nov;91(4):316-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00827.x.
Zotero 插件