• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么机器人介导的神经康复的有效性不一定影响其采用。

Why effectiveness of robot-mediated neurorehabilitation does not necessarily influence its adoption.

出版信息

IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;7:143-53. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2014.2300234.

DOI:10.1109/RBME.2014.2300234
PMID:24803207
Abstract

This paper discusses the reasons why evidence of clinical effectiveness is not enough to facilitate adequate adoption of robotic technologies for upper-limb neurorehabilitation. The paper also provides a short review of the state of the art technologies. In particular, the paper highlights the barriers to the adoption of these technologies by the markets in which they are, or should be, deployed. On the other hand, the paper explores how low rates of adoption may depend on communication biases between the producers of the technologies and potential adopters. Finally, it is shown that, although technology-efficacy issues are usually well-documented, barriers to adoption also originate from the lack of solid evidence of the economic implications of the new technologies.

摘要

本文讨论了为什么临床疗效证据不足以促进上肢神经康复机器人技术的充分采用。本文还对现有技术进行了简要回顾。特别是,本文强调了这些技术在其所在或应部署的市场中采用的障碍。另一方面,本文探讨了采用率低可能取决于技术生产者和潜在采用者之间的沟通偏见。最后,结果表明,尽管技术功效问题通常有充分的记录,但采用障碍也源于缺乏新技术经济影响的可靠证据。

相似文献

1
Why effectiveness of robot-mediated neurorehabilitation does not necessarily influence its adoption.为什么机器人介导的神经康复的有效性不一定影响其采用。
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;7:143-53. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2014.2300234.
2
The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation.机器人系统在中风康复中的价值。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014 Mar;11(2):187-98. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2014.882766. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
3
A Review of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation: Towards an Automated Process for Upper Limb.机器人技术在神经康复中的研究进展:迈向上肢自动化康复流程
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Apr 1;2018:9758939. doi: 10.1155/2018/9758939. eCollection 2018.
4
Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective.三种用于脑卒中康复的上肢机器人设备:综述与临床视角。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):3-11. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130922.
5
Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.应用于神经康复的上肢机器人技术:临床实践概述。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(1):5-15. doi: 10.3233/NRE-171452.
6
Post-stroke robotic training of the upper limb in the early rehabilitation phase.中风后上肢在早期康复阶段的机器人训练
Funct Neurol. 2009 Oct-Dec;24(4):203-6.
7
Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy.中风后上肢康复机器人技术:来自意大利帕多瓦大学的观点
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(12):981-5. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0404.
8
Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.用于中风患者上肢评估与康复的机器人技术。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Sep;13(3):311-24. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848352.
9
Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.机器人技术与康复:慢性脑卒中上肢治疗与评估的新工具。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):223-36. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
10
Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.急性卒中后上肢的机器人辅助康复
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Elbow Exoskeletons: Classification by Structure, Actuation, and Sensing Technologies.肘部外骨骼的全面综述:按结构、驱动和传感技术分类
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;25(14):4263. doi: 10.3390/s25144263.
2
Rehabilitation robotics and allied digital technologies: opportunities, barriers and solutions for improving their clinical implementation. A position paper from the Fit for Medical Robotics Initiative.康复机器人技术及相关数字技术:改善其临床应用的机遇、障碍与解决方案。来自“适合医疗机器人计划”的立场文件。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jul 3;12:1531067. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1531067. eCollection 2025.
3
Rehabilitation with and Without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in Stroke Patients: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness, Acceptability, Usability, and Economic-Organisational Sustainability of RADTs from Subacute to Chronic Phase (STROKEFIT4).
中风患者使用与不使用机器人及相关数字技术(RADTs)的康复治疗:一项关于RADTs从亚急性期到慢性期的有效性、可接受性、可用性以及经济组织可持续性的多中心随机对照试验(STROKEFIT4)的研究方案
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2692. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082692.
4
Physiotherapists' User Acceptance of a Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeleton in Specialized Rehabilitation: Qualitative Exploratory Study.物理治疗师对下肢机器人外骨骼在专业康复中的用户接受度:定性探索性研究。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr 16;12:e68233. doi: 10.2196/68233.
5
Human interactions remain at the heart of rehabilitation with advanced technology: a practice-embedded longitudinal qualitative study with allied health clinicians.在先进技术的背景下,人际互动仍是康复治疗的核心:一项针对专职医疗临床医生的实践嵌入式纵向定性研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Mar 7;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01576-1.
6
Advanced Technology in a Real-World Rehabilitation Setting: Longitudinal Observational Study on Clinician Adoption and Implementation.现实世界康复环境中的先进技术:关于临床医生采用与实施情况的纵向观察研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 30;26:e60374. doi: 10.2196/60374.
7
Cost analysis of technological vs. conventional upper limb rehabilitation for patients with neurological disorders: an Italian real-world data case study.技术与传统上肢康复治疗神经障碍患者的成本分析:意大利真实世界数据案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;12:1445099. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445099. eCollection 2024.
8
Quantifying Treatments as Usual and with Technologies in Neurorehabilitation of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤个体神经康复中常规治疗与技术治疗的量化
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;12(18):1840. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12181840.
9
Stroke rehabilitation: from diagnosis to therapy.中风康复:从诊断到治疗。
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1402729. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402729. eCollection 2024.
10
Clinician perceptions of a novel wearable robotic hand orthosis for post-stroke hemiparesis.临床医生对一种用于中风后偏瘫的新型可穿戴机器人手部矫形器的看法。
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Mar;47(6):1577-1586. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2375056. Epub 2024 Jul 8.