Sharma Bimla, Sood Jayashree, Sehgal Raminder, Sahai Chand, Gera Anjali
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):177-82. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130005.
Positioning an anesthetized patient prone is challenging with regard to manpower requirement, time to surgical readiness and airway management. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway™ (PLMA) is emerging as a suitable alternative, both as a primary and a rescue airway device to the tracheal tube (TT) for patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.
In this prospective randomized study, 70 patients scheduled to undergo pilonidal sinus excision in prone position were allocated to two groups of 35 patients each, depending on the position of the patient at induction and device placement: Group S (device placed while supine) and Group P (device placed while prone). We compared the manpower requirement, time to surgical readiness, efficacy and safety of the PLMA for airway management in the two groups.
The number of personnel [5 (4-6) vs. 3 (3-3); P < 0.001] required for positioning the patient and surgical readiness time (22.1 ± 3 vs. 5.9 ± 0.9 min; P < 0.001) was higher in group S. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to efficacy and safety of the PLMA. Incidence of blood on the PLMA cuff and sore throat was comparable in the two groups (P = 1.000).
We conclude that induction and placing the PLMA in the prone position by experienced users require fewer personnel and reduces surgical readiness time.
对于麻醉状态下的患者,将其置于俯卧位在人力需求、手术准备时间和气道管理方面具有挑战性。喉罩气道™(PLMA)正在成为一种合适的替代方案,作为气管导管(TT)的主要和急救气道装置,用于俯卧位手术患者。
在这项前瞻性随机研究中,70例计划进行俯卧位藏毛窦切除术的患者根据诱导和装置放置时患者的体位被分为两组,每组35例:S组(仰卧位放置装置)和P组(俯卧位放置装置)。我们比较了两组中使用PLMA进行气道管理的人力需求、手术准备时间、有效性和安全性。
S组在患者体位摆放和手术准备时间方面所需人员数量更多[5(4 - 6)对3(3 - 3);P < 0.001],手术准备时间更长(22.1 ± 3对5.9 ± 0.9分钟;P < 0.001)。两组在PLMA的有效性和安全性方面没有差异。两组PLMA套囊上有血和咽痛的发生率相当(P = 1.000)。
我们得出结论,经验丰富的使用者在俯卧位诱导并放置PLMA需要的人员更少,且可缩短手术准备时间。