Suppr超能文献

俯卧位插入喉罩气道™:手术室人员和时间的最佳利用?

ProSeal laryngeal mask airway™ insertion in the prone position: Optimal utilization of operation theatre personnel and time?

作者信息

Sharma Bimla, Sood Jayashree, Sehgal Raminder, Sahai Chand, Gera Anjali

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):177-82. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Positioning an anesthetized patient prone is challenging with regard to manpower requirement, time to surgical readiness and airway management. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway™ (PLMA) is emerging as a suitable alternative, both as a primary and a rescue airway device to the tracheal tube (TT) for patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective randomized study, 70 patients scheduled to undergo pilonidal sinus excision in prone position were allocated to two groups of 35 patients each, depending on the position of the patient at induction and device placement: Group S (device placed while supine) and Group P (device placed while prone). We compared the manpower requirement, time to surgical readiness, efficacy and safety of the PLMA for airway management in the two groups.

RESULTS

The number of personnel [5 (4-6) vs. 3 (3-3); P < 0.001] required for positioning the patient and surgical readiness time (22.1 ± 3 vs. 5.9 ± 0.9 min; P < 0.001) was higher in group S. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to efficacy and safety of the PLMA. Incidence of blood on the PLMA cuff and sore throat was comparable in the two groups (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that induction and placing the PLMA in the prone position by experienced users require fewer personnel and reduces surgical readiness time.

摘要

背景

对于麻醉状态下的患者,将其置于俯卧位在人力需求、手术准备时间和气道管理方面具有挑战性。喉罩气道™(PLMA)正在成为一种合适的替代方案,作为气管导管(TT)的主要和急救气道装置,用于俯卧位手术患者。

材料与方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,70例计划进行俯卧位藏毛窦切除术的患者根据诱导和装置放置时患者的体位被分为两组,每组35例:S组(仰卧位放置装置)和P组(俯卧位放置装置)。我们比较了两组中使用PLMA进行气道管理的人力需求、手术准备时间、有效性和安全性。

结果

S组在患者体位摆放和手术准备时间方面所需人员数量更多[5(4 - 6)对3(3 - 3);P < 0.001],手术准备时间更长(22.1 ± 3对5.9 ± 0.9分钟;P < 0.001)。两组在PLMA的有效性和安全性方面没有差异。两组PLMA套囊上有血和咽痛的发生率相当(P = 1.000)。

结论

我们得出结论,经验丰富的使用者在俯卧位诱导并放置PLMA需要的人员更少,且可缩短手术准备时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae3a/4009635/33d707fe6a5a/JOACP-30-177-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验