• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婚姻的平均场博弈

Mean-field games for marriage.

作者信息

Bauso Dario, Dia Ben Mansour, Djehiche Boualem, Tembine Hamidou, Tempone Raul

机构信息

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Gestionale, Informatica, Meccanica, Palermo, Italy.

SRI Center for Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 May 7;9(5):e94933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094933. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0094933
PMID:24804835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4012996/
Abstract

This article examines mean-field games for marriage. The results support the argument that optimizing the long-term well-being through effort and social feeling state distribution (mean-field) will help to stabilize marriage. However, if the cost of effort is very high, the couple fluctuates in a bad feeling state or the marriage breaks down. We then examine the influence of society on a couple using mean-field sentimental games. We show that, in mean-field equilibrium, the optimal effort is always higher than the one-shot optimal effort. We illustrate numerically the influence of the couple's network on their feeling states and their well-being.

摘要

本文研究婚姻的平均场博弈。结果支持了这样一种观点,即通过努力和社会情感状态分布(平均场)来优化长期幸福感将有助于稳定婚姻。然而,如果努力成本非常高,夫妻双方会在不良情绪状态中波动,或者婚姻破裂。然后,我们使用平均场情感博弈来研究社会对夫妻的影响。我们表明,在平均场均衡中,最优努力总是高于一次性最优努力。我们通过数值示例说明了夫妻网络对他们的情感状态和幸福感的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/8525bd6a7e73/pone.0094933.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/a19e34a94876/pone.0094933.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/593b6b177245/pone.0094933.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/cd5019f2645b/pone.0094933.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/60232f8325ed/pone.0094933.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/3446b43a559a/pone.0094933.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/82c6ffe424a2/pone.0094933.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/c10260b73db3/pone.0094933.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/f8148206de93/pone.0094933.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/6eca05201f5b/pone.0094933.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/fc55cee0f587/pone.0094933.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/3cd03724a783/pone.0094933.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/9ff484a1f554/pone.0094933.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/e37335e7b564/pone.0094933.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/74285aa3190e/pone.0094933.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/2d01a0d75578/pone.0094933.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/1df5dfffce5c/pone.0094933.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/5b297421fcd8/pone.0094933.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/31dbc5e44f03/pone.0094933.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/17549b3512f3/pone.0094933.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/4caa7b3c9d00/pone.0094933.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/1823ce23f313/pone.0094933.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/8525bd6a7e73/pone.0094933.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/a19e34a94876/pone.0094933.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/593b6b177245/pone.0094933.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/cd5019f2645b/pone.0094933.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/60232f8325ed/pone.0094933.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/3446b43a559a/pone.0094933.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/82c6ffe424a2/pone.0094933.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/c10260b73db3/pone.0094933.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/f8148206de93/pone.0094933.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/6eca05201f5b/pone.0094933.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/fc55cee0f587/pone.0094933.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/3cd03724a783/pone.0094933.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/9ff484a1f554/pone.0094933.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/e37335e7b564/pone.0094933.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/74285aa3190e/pone.0094933.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/2d01a0d75578/pone.0094933.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/1df5dfffce5c/pone.0094933.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/5b297421fcd8/pone.0094933.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/31dbc5e44f03/pone.0094933.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/17549b3512f3/pone.0094933.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/4caa7b3c9d00/pone.0094933.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/1823ce23f313/pone.0094933.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e4f/4012996/8525bd6a7e73/pone.0094933.g022.jpg

相似文献

1
Mean-field games for marriage.婚姻的平均场博弈
PLoS One. 2014 May 7;9(5):e94933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094933. eCollection 2014.
2
A mathematical model of sentimental dynamics accounting for marital dissolution.考虑婚姻解体的情感动力学数学模型。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 31;5(3):e9881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009881.
3
A model for computing genes governing marital dissolution through sentimental dynamics.一个通过情感动态计算影响婚姻解体的基因的模型。
J Theor Biol. 2014 Jul 21;353:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
4
Political economy of family life: couple's earnings, welfare regime and union dissolution.家庭生活的政治经济学:夫妻收入、福利制度与婚姻关系解体
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jan;61:43-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Progress and continued challenges in understanding the transition to parenthood.理解为人父母角色转变过程中的进展与持续挑战。
J Fam Issues. 1985 Dec;6(4):395-408. doi: 10.1177/019251385006004001.
6
Wedding Imagery and Public Support for Gay Marriage.婚礼意象与公众对同性婚姻的支持。
J Homosex. 2016 Aug;63(8):1041-51. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1150023. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
The couple's constructive and destructive superego functions.这对夫妻的建设性和破坏性超我功能。
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1993;41(3):653-77. doi: 10.1177/000306519304100302.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Symposium on object relations theory and love. Love, the couple, and the group: a psychoanalytic frame.客体关系理论与爱的研讨会。爱、伴侣与群体:一种精神分析框架。
Psychoanal Q. 1980 Jan;49(1):78-108.
10
[Family counseling in infertility couples].[不孕不育夫妇的家庭咨询]
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1995;60(2):75-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Controlling forever love.控制永远的爱。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0260529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260529. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A mathematical model of sentimental dynamics accounting for marital dissolution.考虑婚姻解体的情感动力学数学模型。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 31;5(3):e9881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009881.