Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, and State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Jiangsu 210093, China.
J Neurosci. 2014 May 7;34(19):6510-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5094-13.2014.
Motor activity is often initiated by a population of command-like interneurons. Command-like interneurons that reliably drive programs have received the most attention, so little is known about how less reliable command-like interneurons may contribute to program generation. We study two electrically coupled interneurons, cerebral-buccal interneuron-2 (CBI-2) and CBI-11, which activate feeding motor programs in the mollusk Aplysia californica. Earlier work indicated that, in rested preparations, CBI-2, a powerful activator of programs, can trigger ingestive and egestive programs. CBI-2 reliably generated ingestive patterns only when it was repeatedly stimulated. The ability of CBI-2 to trigger motor activity has been attributed to the two program-promoting peptides it contains, FCAP and CP2. Here, we show that CBI-11 differs from CBI-2 in that it contains FCAP but not CP2. Furthermore, it is weak in its ability to drive programs. On its own, CBI-11 is therefore less effective as a program activator. When it is successful, however, CBI-11 is an effective specifier of motor activity; that is, it drives mostly ingestive programs. Importantly, we found that CBI-2 and CBI-11 complement each other's actions. First, prestimulation of CBI-2 enhanced the ability of CBI-11 to drive programs. This effect appears to be partly mediated by CP2. Second, coactivation of CBI-11 with CBI-2 makes CBI-2 programs immediately ingestive. This effect may be mediated by specific actions that CBI-11 exerts on pattern-generating interneurons. Therefore, different classes of command-like neurons in a motor network may make distinct, but potentially complementary, contributions as either activators or specifiers of motor activity.
运动活动通常由一群类似指令的中间神经元发起。具有可靠驱动程序功能的类似指令中间神经元受到了最多的关注,因此对于不太可靠的类似指令中间神经元如何可能有助于程序生成,人们知之甚少。我们研究了两种电耦合的中间神经元,脑-颊中间神经元-2(CBI-2)和 CBI-11,它们在加利福尼亚海兔 Aplysia californica 中激活摄食运动程序。早期的工作表明,在休息状态下,作为强有力的程序激活剂的 CBI-2 可以触发摄食和排遗程序。只有当 CBI-2 被反复刺激时,它才能可靠地产生摄食模式。CBI-2 触发运动活动的能力归因于它包含的两种促进程序的肽,FCAP 和 CP2。在这里,我们表明 CBI-11 与 CBI-2 不同,它含有 FCAP 但不含 CP2。此外,它驱动程序的能力较弱。因此,CBI-11 本身作为程序激活剂的效果较差。然而,当它成功时,CBI-11 是运动活动的有效指定者;也就是说,它主要驱动摄食程序。重要的是,我们发现 CBI-2 和 CBI-11 相互补充彼此的作用。首先,CBI-2 的预先刺激增强了 CBI-11 驱动程序的能力。这种效应似乎部分是由 CP2 介导的。其次,CBI-11 与 CBI-2 的共同激活使 CBI-2 程序立即具有摄食性。这种效应可能是由 CBI-11 对模式生成中间神经元施加的特定作用介导的。因此,运动网络中的不同类别的类似指令神经元可能作为激活剂或运动活动的指定者,做出不同但潜在互补的贡献。