Institute of Psychology and DFG Research Unit Person Perception, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany, and Department of Cognitive Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.
J Neurosci. 2014 May 7;34(19):6640-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5326-13.2014.
The magnitude of repetition suppression (RS) in the Fusiform Face Area is influenced by the probability of repetitions of faces (Summerfield et al., 2008), implying that perceptual expectations affect repetition-related processes. Surprisingly, however, macaque single-cell (Kaliukhovich and Vogels, 2011) and human fMRI (Kovács et al., 2013) studies have failed to find repetition probability [P(rep)] modulations of RS with nonface stimuli in the occipitotemporal cortex, suggesting that the effect is face specific. One possible explanation of this category selectivity is that the extensive experience humans have with faces affects the neural mechanisms of RS specifically, creating P(rep) modulatory effects. To address this question, we used fMRI to test the P(rep) effects for another well trained stimulus category, upright letters of the roman alphabet as well as for unfamiliar false fonts. We observed significant RS for both stimulus sets in the Letter Form Area as well as in the caudodorsal part of the lateral occipital complex. Interestingly, the influence of P(rep) on RS was dependent on the stimulus: while we observed P(rep) modulations for the roman letters, no such effects were found for the unfamiliar false fonts in either area. Our findings suggest that P(rep) effects on RS are manifest for nonface stimuli as well, but that they depend on the experience of the subjects with the stimulus category. This shows, for the first time, that prior experience affects the influence of contextual predictive information on RS in the human occipitotemporal cortex.
梭状回面孔区(Fusiform Face Area)中重复抑制(repetition suppression,RS)的幅度受到面孔重复概率(probability of repetitions of faces)的影响(Summerfield 等人,2008),这表明知觉预期会影响与重复相关的过程。然而,令人惊讶的是,猕猴单细胞(Kaliukhovich 和 Vogels,2011)和人类 fMRI(Kovács 等人,2013)研究未能发现枕颞皮质中非面孔刺激的重复概率(repetition probability,P(rep))调制的 RS,这表明这种效应是面孔特异性的。这种类别选择性的一个可能解释是,人类对面孔的广泛经验会特别影响 RS 的神经机制,从而产生 P(rep)调节效应。为了解决这个问题,我们使用 fMRI 测试了另一个经过充分训练的刺激类别——直立的罗马字母以及不熟悉的假字体的 P(rep)效应。我们在字母形状区(Letter Form Area)以及外侧枕叶复合体的尾侧背侧部分观察到了这两个刺激集的显著 RS。有趣的是,P(rep)对 RS 的影响取决于刺激:虽然我们观察到了罗马字母的 P(rep)调制,但在这两个区域都没有发现不熟悉的假字体的 P(rep)调制效应。我们的研究结果表明,P(rep)对 RS 的影响也适用于非面孔刺激,但这取决于被试对刺激类别的经验。这首次表明,先前的经验会影响上下文预测信息对人类枕颞皮质 RS 的影响。