Ozer Sezin, Sen Tunc Emine, Tuloglu Nuray, Bayrak Sule
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Kurupelit, 55139 Samsun, Turkey.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:580675. doi: 10.1155/2014/580675. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
This study aimed to compare the solubility of a universal restorative resin composite (Filtek Z250; FZ250) and a silorane-based resin composite (Filtek Silorane; FS) after immersion in alcohol-containing mouthrinse, alcohol-free mouthrinse, and artificial saliva.
30 discs (10 mm × 1 mm) were prepared from each material and desiccated until a constant mass was obtained. Specimens were immersed in the test solutions for two days and desiccated again. Solubility was calculated based on the change in weight of each specimen before and after immersion. Data was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc test (P < 0.05).
Solubility values for both resin composites were the highest in the alcohol-containing mouthrinse. FZ250 showed greater solubility than FS; the difference was only significant in artificial saliva.
Both resin-composite materials tested exhibited some degree of solubility in each of the test solutions. The use of an alcohol-free mouthrinse may be preferable for patients with extensive composite restorations.
本研究旨在比较通用型复合树脂修复材料（Filtek Z250；FZ250）和硅烷化复合树脂（Filtek Silorane；FS）在含酒精漱口水、不含酒精漱口水和人工唾液中浸泡后的溶解度。
从每种材料制备30个圆盘（10毫米×1毫米），干燥至质量恒定。将标本浸泡在测试溶液中两天，然后再次干燥。根据每个标本浸泡前后的重量变化计算溶解度。使用双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验分析数据（P<0.05）。
两种复合树脂在含酒精漱口中的溶解度值最高。FZ250的溶解度高于FS；差异仅在人工唾液中显著。
测试的两种复合树脂材料在每种测试溶液中均表现出一定程度的溶解度。对于有广泛复合树脂修复的患者，使用不含酒精的漱口水可能更可取。
