Greer S, Bauchner H, Zuckerman B
Department of Pediatrics, Boston City Hospital, MA 02118.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989 Dec;31(6):774-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb04073.x.
Five studies assessing the predictive validity of the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) were evaluated and the results were pooled. Only one study demonstrated good compliance with the authors' methodological standards, but the results were similar to the over-all pooled results. The pooled data indicated that for children over three years of age: (1) the DDST is specific (94 per cent of the children with a good outcome were categorized as normal); (2) the DDST is not sensitive (it did not identify 80 per cent of the children who later had a poor outcome); and (3) a child with a poor outcome was 14 times more likely to have an abnormal or questionable DDST result than a normal one. These data suggest that a child with an abnormal DDST is likely to have a poor school outcome and that many children with school-related problems who might benefit from early intervention are not identified by the DDST.
对五项评估丹佛发育筛查测试(DDST)预测效度的研究进行了评估,并汇总了结果。只有一项研究显示完全符合作者的方法学标准,但结果与总体汇总结果相似。汇总数据表明,对于三岁以上的儿童:(1)DDST具有特异性(94%预后良好的儿童被归类为正常);(2)DDST不敏感(它未能识别出80%后来预后不良的儿童);(3)预后不良的儿童DDST结果异常或存疑的可能性是正常儿童的14倍。这些数据表明,DDST结果异常的儿童很可能学业成绩不佳,而且许多可能从早期干预中受益的有学业相关问题的儿童未被DDST识别出来。