Suppr超能文献

在多中心初级保健样本中比较哮喘APGAR系统和哮喘控制测试™。

Comparing the Asthma APGAR system and the Asthma Control Test™ in a multicenter primary care sample.

作者信息

Rank Matthew A, Bertram Susan, Wollan Peter, Yawn Roy A, Yawn Barbara P

机构信息

Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.

Olmsted Medical Center Research, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jul;89(7):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 May 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare asthma control assessment using the Asthma APGAR system, a tool developed by primary care clinicians, in a multicenter primary care sample with the Asthma Control Test (ACT™)/Childhood Asthma Control Test (CACT™), a tool developed by asthma specialists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a substudy of a multicenter, randomized, controlled pragmatic trial that tests the effectiveness of the Asthma APGAR system in primary care practices. As part of the study, enrolled patients completed both the ACT™/CACT™ and the Asthma APGAR system between March 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011. Kappa and McNemar statistics were used to compare the results of questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of the 468 patients in our sample, 306 (65%) were classified as not controlled by the ACT™/CACT™ or the Asthma APGAR system. The overall agreement was 84.4%, with a kappa value of .68 (substantial agreement) and a McNemar test P value of .35 (suggesting no significant difference in the direction of disagreement). Of those with poor control as defined by the Asthma APGAR system, 23.8% (73) had no controller medications and 76.5% (234) were seldom or sometimes able to avoid identified triggers for their asthma. Of those who stated that they had been prescribed controller medications, 116 of 332 (35%) stated that they did not use the controller medication on a daily basis.

CONCLUSION

The Asthma APGAR system and the ACT™/CACT™ similarly assess asthma control in a multicenter primary care-based sample. The Asthma APGAR system identified an "actionable item" in more than 75% (234) of the individuals with poor asthma control, thus linking an assessment of poor asthma control with a management strategy.

摘要

目的

在一个多中心初级保健样本中,比较使用由初级保健临床医生开发的哮喘APGAR系统这一工具与由哮喘专家开发的哮喘控制测试(ACT™)/儿童哮喘控制测试(CACT™)来评估哮喘控制情况。

患者与方法

这是一项多中心、随机、对照实用性试验的子研究,该试验旨在测试哮喘APGAR系统在初级保健实践中的有效性。作为研究的一部分,入选患者在2011年3月1日至2011年12月31日期间完成了ACT™/CACT™和哮喘APGAR系统的测试。使用卡方和麦克尼马尔统计量来比较问卷结果。

结果

在我们样本中的468名患者中,306名(65%)被ACT™/CACT™或哮喘APGAR系统分类为未得到控制。总体一致性为84.4%,卡方值为0.68(高度一致),麦克尼马尔检验P值为0.35(表明在不一致方向上无显著差异)。在哮喘APGAR系统定义为控制不佳的患者中,23.8%(73名)未使用控制药物,76.5%(234名)很少或有时能够避免已确定的哮喘触发因素。在表示已开具控制药物处方的患者中(332名中有116名,35%)表示他们并非每天都使用控制药物。

结论

哮喘APGAR系统和ACT™/CACT™在基于多中心初级保健的样本中对哮喘控制的评估相似。哮喘APGAR系统在超过75%(234名)哮喘控制不佳的个体中识别出了一个“可采取行动的项目”,从而将哮喘控制不佳的评估与管理策略联系起来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验