Carlton B Gwen, Lucas Deborah O, Ellis Elliot F, Conboy-Ellis Kathleen, Shoheiber Omar, Stempel David A
J Asthma. 2005 Sep;42(7):529-35. doi: 10.1081/JAS-67000.
Control of asthma symptoms is, unfortunately, not a reality for many people with asthma. Asthma control is an ongoing challenge, requiring a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute published its Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in 1997, but the extent of implementation of recommendations in physician's practices remains to be determined. We sought to determine if a systematic implementation of the NAEPP practice guidelines would impact physician's treatment decisions for patients with asthma. The Asthma Care Network is a large, national, point-of-care program developed to assist health care providers in the assessment and management of their patients with asthma. Outcome measurements for the program included level of asthma control, activity limitation, sleep disruption, use of rescue medications, use of controller medications, and urgent care services. A total of 4,901 primary care physicians at 2,876 practice sites enrolled more than 60,000 patients. Nearly three fourths of patients reported symptoms consistent with a lack of asthma control (mean 74%, range 69-81%). Approximately 68% of pediatric patients and 78% of adult patients reported limited activities due to asthma in the past week. Sixty-two percent of pediatric patients and 68% of adult patients reported more than two symptomatic days in the past week. Approximately 40% of the patients surveyed were not using controller therapy. The overall percentage of patients reporting uncontrolled asthma who were prescribed a controller medication increased from 60% to 81%, and the use of inhaled corticosteroids containing medications among these patients increased by 52%. As a result of the assessment of the patients' level of asthma control during the office visit, physicians changed their patterns of prescribing controller therapy in patients with uncontrolled asthma.
遗憾的是,对许多哮喘患者来说,控制哮喘症状并非现实。哮喘控制是一项持续的挑战,需要多学科的治疗方法。美国国立心肺血液研究所的国家哮喘教育和预防计划(NAEPP)于1997年发布了《哮喘诊断和管理指南》,但医生在实际诊疗中对这些建议的执行程度仍有待确定。我们试图确定系统实施NAEPP实践指南是否会影响医生对哮喘患者的治疗决策。哮喘护理网络是一个大型的全国性即时护理项目,旨在协助医疗服务提供者评估和管理他们的哮喘患者。该项目的结果指标包括哮喘控制水平、活动受限、睡眠中断、急救药物使用、控制药物使用以及紧急护理服务。来自2876个医疗机构的4901名初级保健医生登记了6万多名患者。近四分之三的患者报告有与哮喘控制不佳相符的症状(平均74%,范围69 - 81%)。在过去一周中,约68%的儿科患者和78%的成年患者报告因哮喘而活动受限。62%的儿科患者和68%的成年患者报告在过去一周中有超过两天出现症状。约40%的接受调查患者未使用控制疗法。报告哮喘未得到控制且被开了控制药物的患者总体比例从60%增至81%,这些患者中含吸入性糖皮质激素药物的使用增加了52%。由于在门诊就诊时对患者哮喘控制水平进行了评估,医生改变了对哮喘未得到控制患者的控制疗法处方模式。