Suppr超能文献

青少年戒烟的尼古丁替代疗法长期疗效:一项随机对照试验

Long-term efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Scherphof Charlotte S, van den Eijnden Regina J J M, Engels Rutger C M E, Vollebergh Wilma A M

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 1;140:217-20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A double-blind RCT on the short-term efficacy of nicotine patches compared to placebo patches among Dutch adolescents was conducted. The findings demonstrated that nicotine patches are efficacious for smoking cessation at end-of-treatment; however, only in highly compliant participants. We tested whether the effects of NRT also held in 6- (T7) and 12-month (T8) follow-up assessments.

METHODS

Adolescents aged 12-18 years, who smoked at least seven cigarettes a day and who were motivated to quit smoking were recruited at school yards and randomly assigned to either a nicotine patch (n=182) or a placebo patch (n=180) condition according to a computer generated list. Participants (N=257, age: 16.7 ± 1.13 years) attended an information meeting followed by a 6- or 9-week treatment. Smoking cessation, compliance, and potential covariates were measured by means of online questionnaires. Smoking cessation at T8 was biochemically validated by saliva cotinine.

RESULTS

At T7, 8.1% and 5.7% of participants were abstinent in the nicotine and placebo patch groups, respectively. At T8, abstinence was 4.4% and 6.6%, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no significant effects of NRT on abstinence rates at T7 (OR=1.54, 95% CI=0.57, 4.16) and validated abstinence rates at T8 (OR=0.64, 95% CI=0.21, 1.93) neither after considering compliance nor after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

NRT fails in helping adolescents quit smoking at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. This finding suggests that a more intensive approach is needed to assist youngsters in their quit attempts.

摘要

背景

在荷兰青少年中开展了一项双盲随机对照试验,比较尼古丁贴片与安慰剂贴片的短期疗效。研究结果表明,在治疗结束时尼古丁贴片对戒烟有效;然而,仅在高度依从的参与者中有效。我们测试了在6个月(T7)和12个月(T8)随访评估中,尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的效果是否依然存在。

方法

招募12至18岁、每天至少吸7支烟且有戒烟意愿的青少年,在校园里根据计算机生成的列表将他们随机分为尼古丁贴片组(n = 182)或安慰剂贴片组(n = 180)。参与者(N = 257,年龄:16.7 ± 1.13岁)参加了一次信息交流会,随后接受为期6周或9周的治疗。通过在线问卷测量戒烟情况、依从性和潜在协变量。T8时的戒烟情况通过唾液可替宁进行生化验证。

结果

在T7时,尼古丁贴片组和安慰剂贴片组分别有8.1%和5.7%的参与者戒烟。在T8时,戒烟率分别为4.4%和6.6%。意向性分析显示,无论是考虑依从性后还是调整协变量后,NRT对T7时的戒烟率(OR = 1.54,95% CI = 0.57,4.16)和T8时经验证的戒烟率(OR = 0.64,95% CI = 0.21,1.93)均无显著影响。

结论

在6个月和12个月的随访中,NRT未能帮助青少年戒烟。这一发现表明,需要采取更强化的方法来帮助年轻人尝试戒烟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验