Cardoso Claudia R L, Leite Nathalie C, Ferreira Marcel T, Salles Gil F
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Croton 72 Jacarepagua, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 22750-240, Brazil.
Acta Diabetol. 2015 Feb;52(1):21-9. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0592-0. Epub 2014 May 10.
The prognostic importance of baseline and serial glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) changes for cardiovascular outcomes is still debated. We aimed to evaluate it in 620 high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes (mean age 60.4 years, 37 % males, 55 % Caucasians). Patients had HbA1c levels measured at study entry and serially during follow-up. Primary end points were total cardiovascular events (CVEs), major CVEs (non-fatal myocardial infarctions and strokes plus cardiovascular deaths) and all-cause mortality. Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortalities were secondary end points. HbA1c was evaluated either as a continuous variable and categorized at clinically relevant cutoffs. Multivariate Cox regressions assessed the associations with end points. After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 125 total CVEs occurred (90 major CVEs), and 111 patients died (64 from cardiovascular diseases). After statistical adjustments for other cardiovascular risk factors, baseline and mean first-year HbA1c predicted all end points, except non-cardiovascular deaths; and hazard ratios tended to be higher for mean first year than for baseline HbA1c. Each 1 % (10.9 mmol/mol) increase in mean first-year HbA1c increased 27 % the risk of major CVEs occurrence (95 % CI 11-45 %). Updating HbA1c for values obtained beyond the second year of follow-up did not improve its predictive performance. The cardiovascular protection was observed until HbA1c values lower than 6.5 % (48 mmol/mol). Moreover, the magnitude of HbA1c reduction during the first year of follow-up was predictive of better cardiovascular outcomes, independent of baseline HbA1c levels. In conclusion, better glycemic control, especially during the first year of follow-up, is determinant of better cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes, without any detectable lower threshold level of HbA1c.
基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化及系列变化对心血管结局的预后重要性仍存在争议。我们旨在对620例2型糖尿病高危个体(平均年龄60.4岁,男性占37%,白种人占55%)进行评估。患者在研究入组时及随访期间连续测量HbA1c水平。主要终点为总心血管事件(CVE)、主要心血管事件(非致死性心肌梗死、中风加心血管死亡)和全因死亡率。心血管和非心血管死亡率为次要终点。HbA1c既作为连续变量进行评估,也按照临床相关临界值进行分类。多变量Cox回归评估其与终点的关联。经过6.6年的中位随访,共发生125例总CVE(90例主要CVE),111例患者死亡(64例死于心血管疾病)。在对其他心血管危险因素进行统计调整后,基线和第一年平均HbA1c可预测除非心血管死亡外的所有终点;第一年平均HbA1c的风险比往往高于基线HbA1c。第一年平均HbA1c每增加1%(10.9 mmol/mol),主要CVE发生风险增加27%(95%CI 11 - 45%)。根据随访第二年以后获得的值更新HbA1c并不能改善其预测性能。在HbA1c值低于6.5%(48 mmol/mol)之前可观察到心血管保护作用。此外,随访第一年期间HbA1c降低的幅度可预测更好的心血管结局,且独立于基线HbA1c水平。总之,更好的血糖控制,尤其是在随访的第一年,是2型糖尿病高危患者获得更好心血管结局的决定因素,且未发现HbA1c有任何可检测到的更低阈值水平。