• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病患者主动脉僵硬度变化对心血管和死亡率结局的预后影响:里约热内卢队列研究。

Prognostic impact of changes in aortic stiffness for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Rio de Janeiro cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rua Croton, 72 Jacarepagua, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 22750-240, Brasil.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 May 14;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01514-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12933-022-01514-8
PMID:35568947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic importance of changes in aortic stiffness for the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality has never been investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to evaluate it in a cohort of 417 patients.

METHODS

Changes in aortic stiffness were assessed by 2 carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CF-PWV) measurements performed over a 4-year period. Multivariable Cox analysis examined the associations between changes in CF-PWV, evaluated as a continuous variable with splines and as categorical ones (quartiles and stable/reduction/increase subgroups), and the occurrence of total cardiovascular events (CVEs), major adverse CVEs (MACEs), and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 8.2 years after the 2nd CF-PWV measurement, there were 101 total CVEs (85 MACEs) and 135 all-cause deaths (64 cardiovascular). As a continuous variable, the lowest risk nadir was at -2.5%/year of CF-PWV change, with significantly higher risks of mortality associated with CF-PWV increases, but no excess risks at extremes of CF-PWV reduction. Otherwise, in categorical analyses, patients in the 1st quartile (greatest CF-PWV reductions) had excess risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratios [HRs]: 2.0-2.7), whereas patients in 3rd quartile had higher risks of all outcomes (HRs: 2.0-3.2), in relation to the lowest risk 2nd quartile subgroup. Patients in the 4th quartile had higher risks of all-cause mortality. Categorization as stable/reduction/increase subgroups was confirmatory, with higher risks at greater reductions (HRs: 1.7-3.3) and at greater increases in CF-PWV (HRs: 1.9-3.4), in relation to those with stable CF-PWV.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in aortic stiffness, mainly increases and possibly also extreme reductions, are predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

背景

主动脉僵硬度的变化对 2 型糖尿病患者不良心血管结局和死亡率的预后意义从未被研究过。我们旨在 417 例患者的队列中评估它。

方法

通过在 4 年内进行 2 次颈股脉搏波速度(CF-PWV)测量来评估主动脉僵硬度的变化。多变量 Cox 分析检查了 CF-PWV 变化与总心血管事件(CVE)、主要不良 CVE(MACE)以及全因和心血管死亡率之间的关联,CF-PWV 变化作为连续变量用样条和分类变量(四分位数和稳定/减少/增加亚组)进行评估。

结果

在第 2 次 CF-PWV 测量后的中位随访 8.2 年内,发生了 101 例总 CVE(85 例 MACE)和 135 例全因死亡(64 例心血管)。作为一个连续变量,CF-PWV 变化的最低风险低谷为-2.5%/年,死亡率的风险显著升高与 CF-PWV 的增加相关,但 CF-PWV 减少的极端值没有多余的风险。否则,在分类分析中,第 1 四分位数(最大的 CF-PWV 减少)的患者有全因和心血管死亡的超额风险(危险比[HR]:2.0-2.7),而第 3 四分位数的患者有更高的所有结局风险(HR:2.0-3.2),与最低风险的第 2 四分位亚组相比。第 4 四分位数的患者有更高的全因死亡率风险。稳定/减少/增加亚组的分类是确认性的,在更大的减少(HR:1.7-3.3)和更大的 CF-PWV 增加(HR:1.9-3.4)中风险更高,与稳定 CF-PWV 的患者相比。

结论

主动脉僵硬度的变化,主要是增加和可能的极端减少,是 2 型糖尿病患者不良心血管结局和死亡率的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/8c11a8f215b9/12933_2022_1514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/9145738e63a4/12933_2022_1514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/744f08ab74b1/12933_2022_1514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/8c11a8f215b9/12933_2022_1514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/9145738e63a4/12933_2022_1514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/744f08ab74b1/12933_2022_1514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2808/9107658/8c11a8f215b9/12933_2022_1514_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of changes in aortic stiffness for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Rio de Janeiro cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者主动脉僵硬度变化对心血管和死亡率结局的预后影响:里约热内卢队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 May 14;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01514-8.
2
Prognostic Value of Changes in Aortic Stiffness for Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality in Resistant Hypertension: a Cohort Study.顽固性高血压患者主动脉僵硬度变化对心血管结局和死亡率的预后价值:一项队列研究
Hypertension. 2022 Feb;79(2):447-456. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18498. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
3
Prognostic Impact of Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.主动脉僵硬度对耐药性高血压患者预后的影响。
Hypertension. 2019 Mar;73(3):728-735. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12367.
4
Correlates of aortic stiffness progression in patients with type 2 diabetes: importance of glycemic control: the Rio de Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者主动脉僵硬进展的相关因素:血糖控制的重要性:里约热内卢 2 型糖尿病队列研究。
Diabetes Care. 2015 May;38(5):897-904. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2791. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Prognostic impact of aortic stiffness in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: the Rio deJaneiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study.主动脉僵硬度对高危2型糖尿病患者的预后影响:里约热内卢2型糖尿病队列研究
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3772-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0506. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
6
Baseline predictors of aortic stiffness progression among multi-ethnic Asians with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病多民族亚洲人群中主动脉僵硬度进展的基线预测因素。
Atherosclerosis. 2017 May;260:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
7
Aortic-Brachial Stiffness Mismatch and Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.腹膜透析患者的主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配与死亡率
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2019;44(1):123-132. doi: 10.1159/000498876. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Increasing aortic stiffness is predictive of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Rio-T2DM cohort study.主动脉僵硬度增加可预测2型糖尿病患者的晚期肝纤维化:里约热内卢2型糖尿病队列研究
Liver Int. 2016 Jul;36(7):977-85. doi: 10.1111/liv.12994. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
Traditional and non-traditional risk factors for peripheral artery disease development/progression in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Rio de Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病发展/进展的传统和非传统危险因素:里约热内卢 2 型糖尿病队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Feb 27;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01249-y.
10
HIV Infection Is Not Associated With Aortic Stiffness. Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors Are the Main Determinants-Cross-sectional Results of INI-ELSA-BRASIL.HIV 感染与主动脉僵硬无关。传统心血管危险因素是主要决定因素——INI-ELSA-BRASIL 的横断面研究结果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 May 1;78(1):73-81. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001646.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical research progress in pulse wave velocity in the assessment of vascular aging.脉搏波速度在评估血管老化中的临床研究进展
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Dec 28;49(12):1991-1998. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240210.
2
Association Between Changes in Central Blood Pressure and Peripheral Blood Pressure With New-Onset Hypertension in a Chinese Community-Based Population.中国社区人群中心血压与外周血压变化与新发高血压之间的关联
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Dec;26(12):1479-1486. doi: 10.1111/jch.14920. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
Effects of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors on Markers of Vascular Damage.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Changes in Aortic Stiffness for Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality in Resistant Hypertension: a Cohort Study.顽固性高血压患者主动脉僵硬度变化对心血管结局和死亡率的预后价值:一项队列研究
Hypertension. 2022 Feb;79(2):447-456. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18498. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Importance of hematological parameters for micro- and macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Rio de Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study.重要的血液学参数的微血管和大血管的结果在患者 2 型糖尿病:里约热内卢 2 型糖尿病队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jul 6;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01324-4.
3
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对血管损伤标志物的影响
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 16;13(3):536. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030536.
4
Combined evaluation of arterial stiffness, glycemic control and hypertension for macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes.联合评估动脉僵硬度、血糖控制和高血压对 2 型糖尿病大血管并发症的影响。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Nov 28;21(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01696-1.
Arterial Stiffness and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension.
动脉僵硬度与高血压心血管风险。
Circ Res. 2021 Apr 2;128(7):864-886. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318061. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Short-Term Prognostic Impact of Arterial Stiffness in Older Adults Without Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease.老年人中无现有心血管疾病的动脉僵硬的短期预后影响。
Hypertension. 2019 Dec;74(6):1373-1382. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13496. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
5
Cubic splines to model relationships between continuous variables and outcomes: a guide for clinicians.用于模拟连续变量与结果之间关系的三次样条曲线:临床医生指南
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Apr;55(4):675-680. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0679-x. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Effects of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs on Endothelial Function and Arterial Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型抗糖尿病药物对血管内皮功能和动脉僵硬度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Dec 4;2018:1232583. doi: 10.1155/2018/1232583. eCollection 2018.
7
Therapeutic options to reduce advanced glycation end products in patients with diabetes mellitus: A review.治疗糖尿病患者晚期糖基化终产物的选择:综述。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;148:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Effects of statin therapy on arterial stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.他汀类药物治疗对动脉僵硬度的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:338-341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.073. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
9
Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts incident cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes treated in primary care.主动脉脉搏波速度可预测基层医疗中接受治疗的2型糖尿病患者发生心血管事件的风险。
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Sep-Oct;30(7):1223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
10
Change in Pulse Wave Velocity and Short-Term Development of Cardiovascular Events in the Hemodialysis Population.血液透析人群中脉搏波速度的变化与心血管事件的短期发展
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Sep;18(9):857-63. doi: 10.1111/jch.12843. Epub 2016 May 25.