坦桑尼亚卫生机构对外科高血压和糖尿病初级护理的准备情况:一项横断面调查。
Preparedness of Tanzanian health facilities for outpatient primary care of hypertension and diabetes: a cross-sectional survey.
出版信息
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 May;2(5):e285-92. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70033-6.
BACKGROUND
Historically, health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa have mainly managed acute, infectious diseases. Few data exist for the preparedness of African health facilities to handle the growing epidemic of chronic, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). We assessed the burden of NCDs in health facilities in northwestern Tanzania and investigated the strengths of the health system and areas for improvement with regard to primary care management of selected NCDs.
METHODS
Between November, 2012, and May, 2013, we undertook a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 24 public and not-for profit health facilities in urban and rural Tanzania (four hospitals, eight health centres, and 12 dispensaries). We did structured interviews of facility managers, inspected resources, and administered self-completed questionnaires to 335 health-care workers. We focused on hypertension, diabetes, and HIV (for comparison). Our key study outcomes related to service provision, availability of guidelines and supplies, management and training systems, and preparedness of human resources.
FINDINGS
Of adult outpatient visits to hospitals, 58% were for chronic diseases compared with 20% at health centres, and 13% at dispensaries. In many facilities, guidelines, diagnostic equipment, and fi rst-line drug therapy for the primary care of NCDs were inadequate, and management, training, and reporting systems were weak. Services for HIV accounted for most chronic disease visits and seemed stronger than did services for NCDs. Ten (42%) facilities had guidelines for HIV whereas three (13%) facilities did for NCDs. 261 (78%) health workers showed fair knowledge of HIV, whereas 198 (59%) did for hypertension and 187 (56%) did for diabetes. Generally, health systems were weaker in lower-level facilities. Front-line health-care workers (such as non-medical-doctor clinicians and nurses) did not have knowledge and experience of NCDs. For example, only 74 (49%) of 150 nurses had at least fair knowledge of diabetes care compared with 85 (57%) of 150 for hypertension and 119 (79%) of 150 for HIV, and only 31 (21%) of 150 had seen more than fi ve patients with diabetes in the past 3 months compared with 50 (33%) of 150 for hypertension and 111 (74%) of 150 for HIV.
INTERPRETATION
Most outpatient services for NCDs in Tanzania are provided at hospitals, despite present policies stating that health centres and dispensaries should provide such services. We identifi ed crucial weaknesses (and strengths) in health systems that should be considered to improve primary care for NCDs in Africa and identified ways that HIV programmes could serve as a model and structural platform for these improvements.
背景
历史上,撒哈拉以南非洲的卫生机构主要管理急性传染病。关于非洲卫生机构应对日益流行的慢性非传染性疾病(NCDs)的准备情况,几乎没有数据。我们评估了坦桑尼亚西北部卫生机构的 NCD 负担,并调查了卫生系统的优势以及在处理选定 NCD 的初级保健方面的改进领域。
方法
2012 年 11 月至 2013 年 5 月,我们对坦桑尼亚城乡的 24 个公立和非营利性卫生机构(4 家医院、8 个卫生中心和 12 个诊所)进行了具有代表性的横断面调查。我们对设施管理人员进行了结构化访谈,检查了资源,并对 335 名卫生保健工作者进行了自我完成的问卷调查。我们专注于高血压、糖尿病和艾滋病毒(用于比较)。我们的主要研究结果与服务提供、指南和供应品的可用性、管理和培训系统以及人力资源准备有关。
发现
在医院的成年门诊就诊中,58%是慢性疾病,而在卫生中心就诊的为 20%,在诊所就诊的为 13%。在许多设施中,初级保健 NCD 管理的指南、诊断设备和一线药物治疗不足,管理、培训和报告系统薄弱。艾滋病毒服务占慢性疾病就诊的大部分,似乎比 NCD 服务更强。10 个(42%)设施有 HIV 指南,而 3 个(13%)设施有 NCD 指南。261 名(78%)卫生工作者对艾滋病毒有良好的了解,而 198 名(59%)对高血压有良好的了解,187 名(56%)对糖尿病有良好的了解。一般来说,基层卫生机构的卫生系统较弱。一线卫生保健工作者(如非医师临床医生和护士)对 NCD 缺乏知识和经验。例如,仅有 74 名(49%)150 名护士对糖尿病护理有至少良好的了解,而 85 名(57%)150 名护士对高血压有良好的了解,119 名(79%)150 名护士对艾滋病毒有良好的了解,而仅有 31 名(21%)150 名护士在过去 3 个月中见过超过 5 名糖尿病患者,而 50 名(33%)150 名护士对高血压有良好的了解,111 名(74%)150 名护士对艾滋病毒有良好的了解。
解释
坦桑尼亚大多数 NCD 门诊服务都是在医院提供的,尽管目前的政策规定卫生中心和诊所应该提供此类服务。我们发现卫生系统存在严重的弱点(和优势),应该考虑这些弱点以改善非洲的初级保健 NCD,并确定艾滋病毒方案如何作为这些改进的模式和结构平台。
相似文献
Trop Med Int Health. 2015-10
引用本文的文献
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024
本文引用的文献
Sci Transl Med. 2013-4-17