Bataille Benoît, Rao Guillaume, Cocquet Pierre, Mora Michel, Masson Bruno, Ginot Jean, Silva Stein, Moussot Pierre-Etienne
Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Narbonne, Bd Dr Lacroix, 11100, Narbonne, France,
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9582-6. Epub 2014 May 13.
Extravascular lung water (EVLW) could increase by permeability pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic oedema, or both. Transthoracic echocardiography examination of a patient allows quantifying B-lines, originating from water-thickened interlobular septa, and the E/Ea ratio, related to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The aim of our study was to assess the correlation and the trending ability between EVLW measured by transpulmonary thermodilution and the B-lines score or the E/Ea ratio in patients with ARDS. Twenty-six intensive care unit patients were prospectively included. B-lines score was obtained from four ultrasound zones (anterior and lateral chest on left and right hemithorax). E/Ea was measured from the apical four-chamber view. EVLW was compared with the B-lines score and the E/Ea ratio. A linear mixed effect model was used to take account the repeated measurements. A p value<0.05 was considered significant. A total of 73 measurements were collected. The correlation coefficient between EVLW and B-lines score was 0.66 (EVLW=0.71 B-lines+7.64, R2=0.44, p=0.001), versus 0.31 for E/Ea (p=0.06). The correlation between EVLW changes and B-lines variations was significant (R2=0.26, p<0.01), with a concordance rate of 74%. A B-lines score≥6 had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 77% to predict EVLW>10 ml/kg, with an AUC equal to 0.86 (0.76-0.93). The gray zone approach identified a range of B-lines between four and seven for which EVLW>10 ml/kg could not be predicted reliably. The correlation between ultrasound B-lines and EVLW was significant, but the B-lines score was not able to track EVLW changes reliably.
血管外肺水(EVLW)可因通透性肺水肿、心源性肺水肿或两者共同作用而增加。对患者进行经胸超声心动图检查可对源自水增厚小叶间隔的B线以及与肺毛细血管楔压相关的E/Ea比值进行定量分析。我们研究的目的是评估经肺热稀释法测量的EVLW与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的B线评分或E/Ea比值之间的相关性及趋势分析能力。前瞻性纳入了26例重症监护病房患者。B线评分来自四个超声区域(左右半胸的前胸和侧胸)。E/Ea比值从心尖四腔心切面测量。将EVLW与B线评分和E/Ea比值进行比较。采用线性混合效应模型来考虑重复测量。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。共收集了73次测量数据。EVLW与B线评分之间的相关系数为0.66(EVLW = 0.71×B线评分 + 7.64,R² = 0.44,p = 0.001),而与E/Ea比值的相关系数为0.31(p = 0.06)。EVLW变化与B线变化之间的相关性显著(R² = 0.26,p < 0.01),一致性率为74%。B线评分≥6对预测EVLW>10 ml/kg的敏感性为82%,特异性为7�%,曲线下面积(AUC)等于0.86(0.76 - 0.93)。灰色区域法确定了B线在4至7之间的范围,在此范围内无法可靠预测EVLW>10 ml/kg。超声B线与EVLW之间的相关性显著,但B线评分无法可靠地追踪EVLW的变化。