Sibbald W J, Short A K, Warshawski F J, Cunningham D G, Cheung H
Chest. 1985 May;87(5):585-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.5.585.
To assess the concurrent influence on extravascular lung water (EVLW) content of the intravascular Starling forces, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and the colloid osmotic pressure (COP), we measured EVLW by the thermal green dye technique in 174 patients with and without radiographically defined pulmonary edema; in the former group, patients with cardiac (CPE) and noncardiac (NCPE) causes of pulmonary edema were compared (study A). In 119 patients, EVLW was again measured one to three days later (study B). Patients with CPE demonstrated a significantly lower EVLW (9.3 +/- 3.9 ml/kg) (mean +/- SD) than patients with NCPE (14.5 +/- 4.9 ml/kg; p less than 0.05), despite a higher mean PCWP in the former group (20 +/- 7 mm Hg) than in the latter (12 +/- 6 mm Hg; p less than 0.05). In patients potentially with only a hydrostatic cause of pulmonary edema in study A, regression analysis demonstrated the following: EVLW = 3.2 + 0.30 PCWP (r2 = 0.38; p less than 0.005); and in patients with NCPE, EVLW = 10.9 + 0.304 PCWP (r2 = 0.17; p less than 0.01). In study B the change (delta) in EVLW between the two studies was described as follows: delta EVLW = 0.25 + 0.173 delta PCWP (p less than 0.01) + 0.663 group NCPE (p, not significant) + 0.236 group NCPE X delta PCWP (p less than 0.01). This latter equation indicated that the EVLW content manifested a greater change with concurrent alterations in the PCWP in patients with NCPE than was found in patients with only a hydrostatic influence to EVLW formation. Therefore, NCPE is characterized by a greater measurable thermal green dye EVLW than is observed in CPE at any given PCWP, and the PCWP synergistically influences EVLW accumulation in both CPE and NCPE.
为评估血管内的 Starling 力、肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)及胶体渗透压(COP)对血管外肺水(EVLW)含量的同时影响,我们采用热绿染技术对 174 例有或无影像学确诊肺水肿的患者测量了 EVLW;在前一组中,对心源性肺水肿(CPE)和非心源性肺水肿(NCPE)患者进行了比较(研究 A)。在 119 例患者中,1 至 3 天后再次测量了 EVLW(研究 B)。CPE 患者的 EVLW(9.3±3.9ml/kg)(均值±标准差)显著低于 NCPE 患者(14.5±4.9ml/kg;p<0.05),尽管前一组的平均 PCWP(20±7mmHg)高于后一组(12±6mmHg;p<0.05)。在研究 A 中可能仅存在肺水肿静水压病因的患者中,回归分析显示如下:EVLW = 3.2 + 0.30PCWP(r2 = 0.38;p<0.005);而在 NCPE 患者中,EVLW = 10.9 + 0.304PCWP(r2 = 0.17;p<0.01)。在研究 B 中,两次研究之间 EVLW 的变化(δ)描述如下:δEVLW = 0.25 + 0.173δPCWP(p<0.01)+ 0.663NCPE 组(p,无显著性)+ 0.236NCPE 组×δPCWP(p<0.01)。后一个方程表明,与仅对 EVLW 形成有静水压影响的患者相比,NCPE 患者的 EVLW 含量随 PCWP 的同时改变表现出更大变化。因此,NCPE 的特点是在任何给定的 PCWP 下,其可测量的热绿染 EVLW 比 CPE 中观察到的更大,并且 PCWP 对 CPE 和 NCPE 中的 EVLW 蓄积均有协同影响。