Suppr超能文献

内部反向膜杂交检测法与GenoType MTBDRplus检测法及其检测rpoB、katG和inhA基因中突变的性能比较

In house reverse membrane hybridisation assay versus GenoType MTBDRplus and their performance to detect mutations in the genes rpoB, katG and inhA.

作者信息

Ferreira Junior Sergio Luiz Montego, Dalla Costa Elis Regina, Santos Paula Gonçalves dos, Gomes Harrison Magdinier, Silva Marcia Susana Nunes, Esteves Leonardo Souza, Oliveira Martha Maria, Maschmann Raquel de Abreu, Kritski Afrânio Lineu, Suffys Philip Noel, Rossetti Maria Lucia Rosa

机构信息

Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Instituto de Doenças do Tórax, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014 Jun;109(3):307-14. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276130469. Epub 2014 May 7.

Abstract

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) threatens global TB control and is a major public health concern in several countries. We therefore developed a multiplex assay (LINE-TB/MDR) that is able to identify the most frequent mutations related to rifampicin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH) resistance. The assay is based on multiplex polymerase chain reaction, membrane hybridisation and colorimetric detection targeting of rpoB and katG genes, as well as the inhA promoter, which are all known to carry specific mutations associated with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). The assay was validated on a reference panel of 108 M. tuberculosis isolates that were characterised by the proportion method and by DNA sequencing of the targets. When comparing the performance of LINE-TB/MDR with DNA sequencing, the sensitivity, specificity and agreement were 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, for RMP and 77.6%, 90.6% and 88.9%, respectively, for INH. Using drug sensibility testing as a reference standard, the performance of LINE-TB/MDR regarding sensitivity, specificity and agreement was 100%, 100% and 100% (95%), respectively, for RMP and 77%, 100% and 88.7% (82.2-95.1), respectively, for INH. LINE-TB/MDR was compared with GenoType MTBDRplus for 65 isolates, resulting in an agreement of 93.6% (86.7-97.5) for RIF and 87.4% (84.3-96.2) for INH. LINE-TB/MDR warrants further clinical validation and may be an affordable alternative for MDR-TB diagnosis.

摘要

耐多药结核病(TB)威胁着全球结核病控制,并且是多个国家主要的公共卫生问题。因此,我们开发了一种多重检测方法(LINE-TB/MDR),该方法能够识别与利福平(RMP)和异烟肼(INH)耐药相关的最常见突变。该检测方法基于多重聚合酶链反应、膜杂交和比色检测,靶向rpoB和katG基因以及inhA启动子,这些基因均已知携带与耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)相关的特定突变。该检测方法在一组108株结核分枝杆菌参考菌株上进行了验证,这些菌株通过比例法和靶标DNA测序进行了特征分析。将LINE-TB/MDR与DNA测序的性能进行比较时,RMP的敏感性、特异性和一致性分别为100%、100%和100%,INH的敏感性、特异性和一致性分别为77.6%、90.6%和88.9%。以药物敏感性测试作为参考标准,LINE-TB/MDR在RMP方面的敏感性、特异性和一致性分别为100%、100%和100%(95%),在INH方面的敏感性、特异性和一致性分别为77%、100%和88.7%(82.2-95.1)。将LINE-TB/MDR与GenoType MTBDRplus对65株菌株进行了比较,RIF的一致性为93.6%(86.7-97.5),INH的一致性为87.4%(84.3-96.2)。LINE-TB/MDR值得进一步进行临床验证,可能是耐多药结核病诊断的一种经济实惠的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17cc/4131782/42a683737ca8/0074-0276-mioc-109-03-00307-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验