Choi Sang-Ho, Hong Sang-Bum, Hong Hyo-Lim, Kim Sung-Han, Huh Jin Won, Sung Heungsup, Lee Sang-Oh, Kim Mi-Na, Jeong Jin-Yong, Lim Chae-Man, Kim Yang Soo, Woo Jun Hee, Koh Younsuck
Department of Infectious diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e97346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097346. eCollection 2014.
The usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cellular analysis in pneumonia has not been adequately evaluated. This study investigated the ability of cellular analysis of BAL fluid to differentially diagnose bacterial pneumonia from viral pneumonia in adult patients who are admitted to intensive care unit.
BAL fluid cellular analysis was evaluated in 47 adult patients who underwent bronchoscopic BAL following less than 24 hours of antimicrobial agent exposure. The abilities of BAL fluid total white blood cell (WBC) counts and differential cell counts to differentiate between bacterial and viral pneumonia were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Bacterial pneumonia (n=24) and viral pneumonia (n=23) were frequently associated with neutrophilic pleocytosis in BAL fluid. BAL fluid median total WBC count (2,815/µL vs. 300/µL, P<0.001) and percentage of neutrophils (80.5% vs. 54.0%, P=0.02) were significantly higher in the bacterial pneumonia group than in the viral pneumonia group. In ROC curve analysis, BAL fluid total WBC count showed the best discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.855 (95% CI, 0.750-0.960). BAL fluid total WBC count ≥ 510/µL had a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 78.3%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 3.83, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.21. When analyzed in combination with serum procalcitonin or C-reactive protein, sensitivity was 95.8%, specificity was 95.7%, PLR was 8.63, and NLR was 0.07. BAL fluid total WBC count ≥ 510/µL was an independent predictor of bacterial pneumonia with an adjusted odds ratio of 13.5 in multiple logistic regression analysis.
Cellular analysis of BAL fluid can aid early differential diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia from viral pneumonia in critically ill patients.
支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液细胞分析在肺炎中的应用尚未得到充分评估。本研究调查了BAL液细胞分析对入住重症监护病房的成年患者细菌性肺炎与病毒性肺炎进行鉴别诊断的能力。
对47例在接触抗菌药物不到24小时后接受支气管镜BAL的成年患者进行BAL液细胞分析。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估BAL液总白细胞(WBC)计数和细胞分类计数区分细菌性肺炎和病毒性肺炎的能力。
细菌性肺炎(n = 24)和病毒性肺炎(n = 23)常与BAL液中性粒细胞增多有关。细菌性肺炎组BAL液总WBC计数中位数(2,815/µL对300/µL,P<0.001)和中性粒细胞百分比(80.5%对54.0%,P = 0.02)显著高于病毒性肺炎组。在ROC曲线分析中,BAL液总WBC计数显示出最佳的鉴别能力,曲线下面积为0.855(95%CI,0.750 - 0.960)。BAL液总WBC计数≥510/µL的敏感度为83.3%,特异度为78.3%,阳性似然比(PLR)为3.83,阴性似然比(NLR)为0.21。与血清降钙素原或C反应蛋白联合分析时,敏感度为95.8%,特异度为95.7%,PLR为8.63,NLR为0.07。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,BAL液总WBC计数≥510/µL是细菌性肺炎的独立预测因素,校正比值比为13.5。
BAL液细胞分析有助于对重症患者的细菌性肺炎与病毒性肺炎进行早期鉴别诊断。