• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

30000个荷兰语单词的习得年龄和具体性规范。

Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words.

作者信息

Brysbaert Marc, Stevens Michaël, De Deyne Simon, Voorspoels Wouter, Storms Gert

机构信息

Ghent University, Belgium.

Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010
PMID:24831463
Abstract

Word processing studies increasingly make use of regression analyses based on large numbers of stimuli (the so-called megastudy approach) rather than experimental designs based on small factorial designs. This requires the availability of word features for many words. Following similar studies in English, we present and validate ratings of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. These include nearly all lemmas language researchers are likely to be interested in. The ratings are freely available for research purposes.

摘要

文字处理研究越来越多地采用基于大量刺激的回归分析(即所谓的大型研究方法),而不是基于小型析因设计的实验设计。这就需要有许多单词的词特征。继英语方面的类似研究之后,我们给出并验证了30000个荷兰语单词的习得年龄和具体性评级。这些几乎涵盖了语言研究人员可能感兴趣的所有词元。这些评级可供研究目的免费使用。

相似文献

1
Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words.30000个荷兰语单词的习得年龄和具体性规范。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 13.
2
Concreteness ratings for 62,000 English multiword expressions.62000 个英语多词表达的具体性评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2522-2531. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01912-6. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.62000 个英语词汇的词频规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):467-479. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9.
4
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.
5
Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.1,659 个法文字汇的具体性规范:与其他心理语言学变数及字词辨识时间的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2366-2387. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1014-y.
6
Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size.40777 个加泰罗尼亚语单词的使用频率规范:词汇量的在线巨量研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3198-3217. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01959-5. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.629 个英语复合词数据库:熟悉度评分、词元意义主导性、语义透明度、习得年龄、形象性和感官体验。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1004-1019. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0523-6.
8
Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?25种语言中299个单词的习得年龄评级:是否存在跨语言的词汇顺序?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1154-77. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6.
9
Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words.超越抽象-具体二分法:一种获取模式,具体性,形象性,熟悉度,习得年龄,语境可用性以及 417 个意大利语单词的抽象性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Nov;42(4):1042-8. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042.
10
Concreteness/abstractness ratings for two-character Chinese words in MELD-SCH.MELD-SCH 中两个汉字的具体/抽象程度评级。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0232133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232133. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development of Early Phonological Networks: An Analysis of Individual Longitudinal Vocabulary Growth.早期语音网络的发展:个体纵向词汇增长分析
Cogn Sci. 2025 Sep;49(9):e70109. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70109.
2
Valence as principal dimension of the semantic space in primary progressive aphasia semantic variant.效价作为原发性进行性失语语义变异型语义空间的主要维度。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jul 23;7(4):fcaf281. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf281. eCollection 2025.
3
A multimodal transformer-based tool for automatic generation of concreteness ratings across languages.
一种基于多模态变压器的工具,用于自动生成跨语言的具体性评级。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;3(1):100. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00280-z.
4
Kalimah norms: Ratings for 2,467 modern standard Arabic words on two scales.卡里玛规范:2467个现代标准阿拉伯语单词在两个量表上的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 9;57(7):194. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02692-5.
5
Fine-Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study.三项任务中细粒度具体性对词汇加工与表征的影响:一项事件相关电位研究
Psychophysiology. 2025 May;62(5):e70074. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074.
6
A lexical database of British Sign Language (BSL) and German Sign Language (DGS): Iconicity ratings, iconic strategies, and concreteness norms.英国手语(BSL)和德国手语(DGS)的词汇数据库:象似性评级、象似策略和具体性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 9;57(5):139. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02660-z.
7
Connectivity of Fronto-Temporal Regions in Syntactic Structure Building During Speaking and Listening.口语和听力过程中句法结构构建时额颞叶区域的连通性
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Oct 8;5(4):922-941. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00154. eCollection 2024.
8
The association of sociodemographic factors with total and item-level semantic fluency metrics.社会人口因素与总项目水平语义流畅性指标的关联。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Oct;38(7):665-678. doi: 10.1037/neu0000955. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
9
The influence of familiarisation and item repetition on the name agreement effect in picture naming.熟悉度和项目重复对图片命名中名称一致性效应的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jul;78(7):1487-1499. doi: 10.1177/17470218241274661. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
10
Large Language Models and the Wisdom of Small Crowds.大语言模型与小众群体的智慧
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 May 20;8:723-738. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00144. eCollection 2024.