Romero-Franco Natalia, Montaño-Munuera Juan Antonio, Jiménez-Reyes Pedro
1 Nursery and Physiotherapy Dept, University of Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain.
2 Physiotherapy Dept, Catholic University of San Antonio of Murcia, Guadalupe, Spain.
J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jan;26(1). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0138. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Knee joint position sense (JPS) is a key parameter for optimum performance in many sports but is frequently negatively affected by injuries and/or fatigue during training sessions. Although evaluation of JPS may provide key information to reduce the risk of injury, it often requires expensive and/or complex tools that make monitoring proprioceptive deterioration difficult.
To analyze the validity and reliability of a digital inclinometer to measure knee JPS in a closed kinetic chain (CKC).
The validity and intertester and intratester reliability of a digital inclinometer for measuring knee JPS were assessed.
Biomechanics laboratory.
10 athletes (5 men and 5 women; 26.2 ± 1.3 y, 71.7 ± 12.4 kg; 1.75 ± 0.09 m; 23.5 ± 3.9 kg/m).
Knee JPS was measured in a CKC.
Absolute angular error (AAE) of knee JPS in a CKC.
Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of the mean (SEM) were calculated to determine the validity and reliability of the inclinometer. Data showed that the inclinometer had a high level of validity compared with an isokinetic dynamometer (ICC = 1.0, SEM = 1.39, p < 0.001), and there was very good intra- and inter-tester reliability for reading the inclinometer (ICC = 1.0, SEM = 0.85, p < 0.001). Compared with AutoCAD video analysis, inclinometer validity was very high (ICC = 0.980, SEM = 3.46, p < 0.001) for measuring AAE during knee JPS in a CKC. In addition, the intertester reliability of the inclinometer for obtaining AAE was very high (ICC = .994, SEM = 1.67, p < 0.001).
The inclinometer provides a valid and reliable method for assessing knee JPS in a CKC. Health and sports professionals could take advantage of this tool to monitor proprioceptive deterioration in athletes.
膝关节位置觉(JPS)是许多运动中实现最佳表现的关键参数,但在训练过程中经常受到损伤和/或疲劳的负面影响。尽管对JPS的评估可能为降低受伤风险提供关键信息,但它通常需要昂贵和/或复杂的工具,这使得监测本体感觉衰退变得困难。
分析数字倾角仪在闭链运动(CKC)中测量膝关节JPS的有效性和可靠性。
评估数字倾角仪测量膝关节JPS的有效性、测试者间信度和测试者内信度。
生物力学实验室。
10名运动员(5名男性和5名女性;年龄26.2±1.3岁,体重71.7±12.4kg;身高1.75±0.09m;身体质量指数23.5±3.9kg/m²)。
在CKC中测量膝关节JPS。
CKC中膝关节JPS的绝对角度误差(AAE)。
计算组内相关系数(ICC)和平均标准误差(SEM)以确定倾角仪的有效性和可靠性。数据显示,与等速测力计相比,倾角仪具有较高的有效性(ICC = 1.0,SEM = 1.39,p < 0.001),并且在读取倾角仪数据方面具有非常好的测试者内和测试者间信度(ICC = 1.0,SEM = 0.85,p < 0.001)。与AutoCAD视频分析相比,在CKC中测量膝关节JPS期间的AAE时,倾角仪的有效性非常高(ICC = 0.980,SEM = 3.46,p < 0.001)。此外,倾角仪获取AAE的测试者间信度非常高(ICC = 0.994,SEM = 1.67,p < 0.001)。
倾角仪为评估CKC中的膝关节JPS提供了一种有效且可靠的方法。健康和运动专业人员可以利用此工具监测运动员的本体感觉衰退。