Suppr超能文献

英格兰将消费者的“轶事性”报告纳入其国家报告系统的经验:对美国的借鉴意义,即该做什么或不该做什么?

England's Experience incorporating "anecdotal" reports from consumers into their national reporting system: lessons for the United States of what to do or not to do?

作者信息

Greaves Felix, Millett Christopher, Nuki Paul

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA

Imperial College London, UK.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):65S-80S. doi: 10.1177/1077558714535470. Epub 2014 May 16.

Abstract

The English National Health Service's public reporting website--known as NHS Choices--has been incorporating anecdotal comments from patients about primary and hospital care since 2007. Publicly reporting patients' narrative comments along with numerical ratings of their experience and clinical quality metrics presents opportunities as well as challenges for reporting systems. This article reviews the lessons learned in England that could be useful to other health systems that are considering a similar approach. We explore five key design considerations for publicly reporting anecdotal comments--including how to collect, moderate, and display comments and how to encourage the public and the health care providers use them. While anecdotal comments might represent an untapped seam of valuable information about service quality and a potential hook for engaging patients to use comparative performance data, the jury is still out on where narrative comments fit in the complex landscape of quality measurement and reporting.

摘要

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的公共报告网站——即“NHS选择”——自2007年以来一直在收录患者对初级医疗和医院护理的轶事性评论。将患者的叙述性评论与他们体验的数值评分及临床质量指标一同进行公开报告,这给报告系统带来了机遇,也带来了挑战。本文回顾了在英国汲取的经验教训,这些经验教训可能对其他正在考虑采用类似方法的医疗系统有用。我们探讨了公开报告轶事性评论的五个关键设计考量因素,包括如何收集、审核和展示评论,以及如何鼓励公众和医疗服务提供者使用这些评论。虽然轶事性评论可能代表了关于服务质量的未开发的宝贵信息来源,以及吸引患者使用比较绩效数据的潜在切入点,但在叙述性评论在质量衡量和报告的复杂格局中所处的位置上,尚无定论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验