Von Glahn Nicholas R, Otani Hajime, Migita Mai, Langford Sara J, Hillard Erin E
a California State Polytechnic University , Pomona.
J Gen Psychol. 2012 Jul-Sep;139(3):134-54. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2012.672938.
Briefly imagining, paraphrasing, or explaining an event causes people to increase their confidence that this event occurred during childhood-the imagination inflation effect. The mechanisms responsible for the effect were investigated with a new paradigm. In Experiment 1, event familiarity (defined as processing fluency) was varied by asking participants to rate each event once, three times, or five times. No inflation was found, indicating that familiarity does not account for the effect. In Experiment 2, richness of memory representation was manipulated by asking participants to generate zero, three, or six details. Confidence increased from the initial to the final rating in the three- and six-detail conditions, indicating that the effect is based on reality-monitoring errors. However, greater inflation in the three-detail condition than in the six-detail condition indicated that there is a boundary condition. These results were also consistent with an alternative hypothesis, the mental workload hypothesis.
简要地想象、释义或解释一个事件会使人们更加确信该事件发生在童年时期——即想象膨胀效应。采用一种新范式对造成该效应的机制进行了研究。在实验1中,通过要求参与者对每个事件进行一次、三次或五次评分来改变事件熟悉度(定义为加工流畅性)。未发现膨胀现象,这表明熟悉度并不能解释该效应。在实验2中,通过要求参与者生成零个、三个或六个细节来操纵记忆表征的丰富性。在三个细节和六个细节条件下,从初始评分到最终评分,信心有所增加,这表明该效应基于现实监控错误。然而,三个细节条件下的膨胀程度大于六个细节条件下的膨胀程度,这表明存在一个边界条件。这些结果也与另一种假设——心理负荷假设相一致。