Sharman Stefanie J, Garry Maryanne, Hunt Maree
Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Nov;120(3):227-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.04.002. Epub 2005 Jun 20.
To investigate whether people can resist imagination inflation--the imagination-induced increased confidence that fictitious childhood events really happened--we gave them different types of cues. In a three-stage procedure, participants: (1) rated their confidence that a list of childhood events had happened to them, (2) imagined some of these events, and (3) made confidence ratings a second time. Subjects received either no cues about the source of the imagined event, an additional source cue (perspective), an additional familiarity cue (a plausibility questionnaire), or both cues. Only subjects who had both types of cues resisted imagination inflation. These results suggest that additional cues can sometimes safeguard people from becoming more confident that fictitious events were genuine experiences.
为了探究人们是否能够抵御想象膨胀——即由想象引发的、对虚构童年事件真的发生过的信心增加——我们给他们提供了不同类型的线索。在一个三阶段程序中,参与者:(1) 对一系列童年事件是否发生在自己身上进行信心评级,(2) 想象其中一些事件,(3) 再次进行信心评级。受试者要么没有收到关于想象事件来源的线索,要么收到一个额外的来源线索(视角),要么收到一个额外的熟悉度线索(一个合理性问卷),要么同时收到这两种线索。只有同时拥有这两种线索的受试者抵御了想象膨胀。这些结果表明,额外的线索有时可以保护人们,使其不会更坚信虚构事件是真实经历。