Prashantha B, Varun S, Sharat Damodar, Murali Mohan B V, Ranganatha R, Naveen Manchal
Department of Hematology, Narayana Hrudayalaya Multispecialty Hospital and Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka 560099 India ; Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Narayana Hrudayalaya-Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, No. 258/A, Bomasandra Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore, 560099 Karnataka India.
Department of Internal Medicine and Pulmonology, Narayana Hrudayalaya Multispecialty Hospital and Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Bangalore, 560099 Karnataka India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014 Jun;30(2):126-9. doi: 10.1007/s12288-013-0242-7. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Our hospital is a referral centre for Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) patients, who as a matter of religious belief refuse transfusions of blood/blood components. We have treated JW patients with dengue fever (DF) and thrombocytopenia without platelet transfusion, without any mortality or major morbidities. We retrospectively compared the duration needed for platelet recovery and duration of hospitalization of DF with thrombocytopenia in those treated with prophylactic platelet transfusion and JW patients who were managed without these. Among JW patients, platelet counts recovered to >50,000 in 2.57 days (Mean) as compared to those who received prophylactic platelet transfusion, who recovered in 4.43 days (P value < 0.0001). They also had significantly less number of days of hospitalization (3.68 days vs 5.13 days, P value < 0.0001). These differences persisted even when a subgroup analysis of patients who had nadir platelet count less than 10,000 were done. Most importantly, none of the patients in either group suffered any significant morbidity or mortality. Prophylactic platelet transfusion in clinically stable DF patients was associated with significant delay in platelet recovery and increased duration of hospitalization, even though was not harmful in terms of morbidity or mortality. Though number of subjects involved in the study was small, this brief report further adds to the current evidence that prophylactic platelet transfusion in clinically stable DF patients with a platelet count more than 10,000/cmm is not indicated.
我院是耶和华见证会(JW)患者的转诊中心,这些患者出于宗教信仰拒绝输血/血液成分。我们对登革热(DF)和血小板减少症的JW患者未进行血小板输注进行治疗,未出现任何死亡或重大并发症。我们回顾性比较了接受预防性血小板输注治疗的患者与未接受预防性血小板输注治疗的JW患者中血小板恢复所需的时间以及DF伴血小板减少症患者的住院时间。在JW患者中,血小板计数平均在2.57天恢复至>50,000,而接受预防性血小板输注的患者则在4.43天恢复(P值<0.0001)。他们的住院天数也显著减少(3.68天对5.13天,P值<0.0001)。即使对最低点血小板计数低于10,000的患者进行亚组分析,这些差异仍然存在。最重要的是,两组患者均未出现任何重大并发症或死亡。临床稳定的DF患者进行预防性血小板输注与血小板恢复显著延迟和住院时间延长相关,尽管在并发症或死亡率方面并无危害。尽管本研究涉及的受试者数量较少,但这份简短报告进一步补充了现有证据,表明对于血小板计数超过10,000/cmm的临床稳定DF患者,不建议进行预防性血小板输注。