Seidenberg Mark S
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Lang Learn Dev. 2013;9(4):331-360. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2013.812017.
Research in cognitive science and neuroscience has made enormous progress toward understanding skilled reading, the acquisition of reading skill, the brain bases of reading, the causes of developmental reading impairments and how such impairments can be treated. My question is: if the science is so good, why do so many people read so poorly? I mainly focus on the United States, which fares poorly on cross-national comparisons of literacy, with about 25-30% of the population exhibiting literacy skills that are low by standard metrics. I consider three possible contributing factors, all of which turn on issues concerning the relationships between written and spoken language. They are: the fact that English has a deep alphabetic orthography; how reading is taught; and the impact of linguistic variability as manifested in the Black-White "achievement gap". I conclude that there are opportunities to increase literacy levels by making better use of what we have learned about reading and language, but also institutional obstacles and understudied issues for which more evidence is badly needed.
认知科学和神经科学在理解熟练阅读、阅读技能的习得、阅读的大脑基础、发展性阅读障碍的成因以及如何治疗这些障碍方面取得了巨大进展。我的问题是:如果科学如此发达,为什么还有这么多人阅读能力如此之差?我主要关注美国,在识字率的跨国比较中,美国的表现不佳,约25%至30%的人口其识字技能按标准衡量较低。我考虑了三个可能的促成因素,所有这些因素都涉及书面语言和口头语言之间的关系问题。它们是:英语具有深度字母正字法这一事实;阅读是如何教授的;以及黑白“成就差距”中体现的语言变异性的影响。我得出的结论是,通过更好地利用我们对阅读和语言的了解,有机会提高识字水平,但也存在制度障碍和研究不足的问题,对此急需更多证据。