• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Utility of a Paediatric Trigger Tool in a Norwegian department of paediatric and adolescent medicine.挪威一家儿科与青少年医学科中儿科触发工具的效用
BMJ Open. 2014 May 19;4(5):e005011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005011.
2
Development of an Electronic Pediatric All-Cause Harm Measurement Tool Using a Modified Delphi Method.使用改良德尔菲法开发电子儿科全因伤害测量工具
J Patient Saf. 2016 Dec;12(4):180-189. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000139.
3
Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool.加拿大儿科触发工具的开发和验证描述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):416-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
4
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Measurement of the incidence of care-associated adverse events at the Department of Pediatrics of a teaching hospital.教学医院儿科护理相关不良事件发生率的测量。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Apr 1;117(2):e106-e109. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.eng.e106.
6
The preliminary development and testing of a global trigger tool to detect error and patient harm in primary-care records.用于检测初级保健记录中的差错和患者伤害的全球触发工具的初步开发与测试。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Apr;85(1002):176-80. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.075788.
7
Prevalence and severity of patient harm in a sample of UK-hospitalised children detected by the Paediatric Trigger Tool.通过儿科触发工具检测的英国住院儿童样本中患者伤害的发生率和严重程度。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 3;4(7):e005066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005066.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Prevalence of Triggers and Patient Harm Identified by Global Trigger Tool in Specialized Palliative Care.全球触发工具识别的专科姑息治疗中触发因素和患者伤害的发生率。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Jun;27(6):742-748. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0496. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
10
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and harm in Emergency Medical Services.开发一种触发工具以识别紧急医疗服务中的不良事件和伤害。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jun;34(6):391-397. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205746. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科住院患者不良事件的发生率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
2
Predicting Adverse Drug Events in Chinese Pediatric Inpatients With the Associated Risk Factors: A Machine Learning Study.基于相关风险因素预测中国儿科住院患者的药物不良事件:一项机器学习研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 27;12:659099. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.659099. eCollection 2021.
3
National and Institutional Trends in Adverse Events Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Retrospective Patient Record Review Studies.随着时间的推移,国家和机构不良事件趋势:系统评价和纵向回顾性患者记录回顾研究的荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):141-148. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000804.
4
Establishment of a pediatric trigger tool based on Global Trigger Tool to identify adverse drug events of children: experience in a Chinese hospital.基于全球触发工具建立儿科触发工具以识别儿童药物不良事件:一家中国医院的经验
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02354-9.
5
Adverse drug events in Chinese pediatric inpatients and associated risk factors: a retrospective review using the Global Trigger Tool.中国儿科住院患者药物不良事件及相关危险因素:应用全球触发工具的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 7;8(1):2573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20868-2.
6
CareTrack Kids-part 3. Adverse events in children's healthcare in Australia: study protocol for a retrospective medical record review.CareTrack儿童版 - 第3部分。澳大利亚儿童医疗保健中的不良事件:回顾性病历审查研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 8;5(4):e007750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007750.
7
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of a modified pediatric early warning score in a department of pediatric and adolescent medicine.在儿科和青少年医学系使用改良儿科早期预警评分。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 26;8(8):e72534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072534. eCollection 2013.
2
Automated detection of adverse events in children.儿童不良事件的自动检测。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;59(6):1269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
3
Measuring adverse events and levels of harm in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool.使用全球触发工具测量儿科住院患者的不良事件和伤害程度。
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1206-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0179. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian Paediatric Adverse Events Study.加拿大医院儿童不良事件:加拿大儿科不良事件研究。
CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18;184(13):E709-18. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112153. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
5
Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records.通过筛选电子健康记录识别的门诊药物不良事件。
J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun;6(2):91-6. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181dcae06.
6
Reliability evaluation of the adapted national coordinating council medication error reporting and prevention (NCC MERP) index.改编后的国家协调委员会用药错误报告与预防(NCC MERP)指数的可靠性评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Sep;16(9):1006-13. doi: 10.1002/pds.1423.
7
Patient safety efforts should focus on medical injuries.患者安全工作应聚焦于医疗损伤。
JAMA. 2002 Apr 17;287(15):1993-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.15.1993.
8
Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error.通过预防医疗差错来促进患者安全。
JAMA. 1998 Oct 28;280(16):1444-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.16.1444.

挪威一家儿科与青少年医学科中儿科触发工具的效用

Utility of a Paediatric Trigger Tool in a Norwegian department of paediatric and adolescent medicine.

作者信息

Solevåg Anne Lee, Nakstad Britt

机构信息

Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 May 19;4(5):e005011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005011.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005011
PMID:24840249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4039807/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The British National Health Service (NHS) Paediatric Trigger Tool (PTT) was made based on various trigger tools developed for use in adults. The PTT has not previously been developed or used in Nordic units. We aimed to compare harm identified through PTT screening with voluntary incidence reports in our department. A secondary aim was to assess utility of the different triggers, including predictive value for identifying harm. We hypothesised that the NHS PTT would need adjustments for the setting in which it is used.

SETTING

A Norwegian level II department of paediatric and adolescent medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 761 acute medical and surgical patient contacts March-May 2011. Median age (IQR) for the trigger positive patients was 2.5 (1.0-8.0) years; range 0-18 years.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence, type and severity of harm identified with the PTT compared with the department's voluntary incidence reports. The type and rate of identified triggers and positive predictive value for harm.

RESULTS

The PTT revealed a harm rate of 5% for medical patients, as compared to 0.5% in the incidence reports the same months. PTT screening revealed other types of harm than those reported by healthcare personnel themselves. We identified only 20 of the 39 NHS PTT triggers. The most frequent trigger was readmission within 30 days. Hypoxia, which was the second most frequent trigger, did not predict any patient harm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the NHS PTT identifies more and other types of harm than voluntary incidence reports. The presence of adult-oriented triggers, triggers that were not identified at all, as well as triggers with a low predictive value for harm may indicate the need for modification of the PTT to different settings. More studies are needed before a final decision is made to exclude triggers from the screening.

摘要

目的

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)儿科触发工具(PTT)是基于为成人开发的各种触发工具制作而成。此前北欧单位尚未开发或使用过PTT。我们旨在比较通过PTT筛查识别出的伤害与我们科室的自愿上报事件。第二个目的是评估不同触发因素的效用,包括识别伤害的预测价值。我们假设NHS PTT需要针对其使用环境进行调整。

设置

挪威一家二级儿科与青少年医学科室。

参与者

2011年3月至5月期间761例急性内科和外科患者接触情况的便利样本。触发因素呈阳性的患者中位年龄(四分位间距)为2.5(1.0 - 8.0)岁;年龄范围为0 - 18岁。

主要和次要结局指标

与科室的自愿上报事件相比,PTT识别出的伤害发生率、类型和严重程度。识别出的触发因素的类型和发生率以及伤害的阳性预测值。

结果

PTT显示内科患者的伤害发生率为5%,而同期上报事件中的发生率为0.5%。PTT筛查发现的伤害类型与医护人员自己上报的不同。我们仅识别出39个NHS PTT触发因素中的20个。最常见的触发因素是30天内再次入院。第二常见的触发因素缺氧并未预测到任何患者伤害。

结论

本研究表明,NHS PTT识别出的伤害比自愿上报事件更多且类型不同。存在以成人为主的触发因素、完全未被识别的触发因素以及对伤害预测价值较低的触发因素,这可能表明需要针对不同环境对PTT进行修改。在最终决定从筛查中排除触发因素之前,还需要更多研究。