Suppr超能文献

通过儿科触发工具检测的英国住院儿童样本中患者伤害的发生率和严重程度。

Prevalence and severity of patient harm in a sample of UK-hospitalised children detected by the Paediatric Trigger Tool.

作者信息

Chapman Susan M, Fitzsimons John, Davey Nicola, Lachman Peter

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Great Ormond Street Hospital 
for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK University College London, London, UK.

Department of Paediatrics, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Ireland Quality & Patient Safety Division, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 3;4(7):e005066. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005066.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The measurement and examination of adverse events (AEs) that occur in children during hospital admissions is essential if we are to prevent, reduce or ameliorate the harm experienced. The UK Paediatric Trigger Tool (UKPTT) is a method of retrospective case note review that measures harm in hospitalised children.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the harm resulting from the processes of healthcare in hospitalised children from centres providing data to the National Health Service (NHS) Institute UKPTT data portal, to understand the positive predictive values of triggers and to make recommendations for the further development of the trigger tool.

SETTING

25 hospitals across the UK, including secondary, tertiary and quaternary paediatric centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Randomly selected children who were admitted to hospital for longer than 24 h.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the rate of harm (the percentage of children experiencing one or more AEs during a hospital admission). Secondary measures were the severity of harm and performance of triggers.

RESULTS

Data from 3992 patient admissions were reviewed across the hospitals and submitted to the trigger tool portal from February 2008 to November 2011. At least one AE was reported for 567 (14.2%) patients, with 211 (5.3%) experiencing more than one event. There were 1001 AEs identified. Where harm occurred, it was considered temporary for 923 (92.2%) AEs; however, 43 (4.3%) AEs resulted in the need for life-sustaining interventions, 18 (1.8%) AEs led to permanent harm and for 17 children (1.7% of AEs) the AE was believed to have contributed to death.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant, measurable level of harm experienced by children admitted to hospitals in the UK. While most of this harm is temporary, some of it is serious. The UKPTT offers organisations the means to measure and examine the AEs occurring in their hospital in order to reduce harm.

摘要

未标注

如果我们要预防、减少或减轻儿童在住院期间所遭受的伤害,对其住院期间发生的不良事件(AE)进行测量和检查至关重要。英国儿科触发工具(UKPTT)是一种回顾性病例记录审查方法,用于测量住院儿童所遭受的伤害。

目的

研究向英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)研究所UKPTT数据门户提供数据的各中心住院儿童医疗过程所造成的伤害,了解触发因素的阳性预测值,并为触发工具的进一步开发提出建议。

地点

英国各地的25家医院,包括二级、三级和四级儿科中心。

参与者

随机选取住院时间超过24小时的儿童。

观察指标

主要观察指标是伤害发生率(住院期间发生一次或多次AE的儿童百分比)。次要指标是伤害严重程度和触发因素的表现。

结果

2008年2月至2011年11月期间,对各医院3992例患者的住院数据进行了审查,并提交至触发工具门户。567例(14.2%)患者报告至少发生一次AE,其中211例(5.3%)发生不止一次事件。共识别出1001起AE。发生伤害的情况中,923起(92.2%)AE被认为是暂时的;然而,43起(4.3%)AE导致需要进行维持生命的干预,18起(1.8%)AE导致永久性伤害,17名儿童(占AE的1.7%)的AE被认为是导致死亡的原因。

结论

英国住院儿童遭受了显著且可测量的伤害。虽然大多数此类伤害是暂时的,但有些伤害很严重。UKPTT为各机构提供了测量和检查其医院发生的AE以减少伤害的方法。

相似文献

2
3
Multicenter Test of an Emergency Department Trigger Tool for Detecting Adverse Events.
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e843-e849. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000516.
4
Development of a Trigger Tool to Identify Adverse Events and Harm in a Neuropsychiatry Setting.
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e343-e350. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000784.
5
Describing adverse events in medical inpatients using the Global Trigger Tool.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Nov 10;149:w20149. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20149. eCollection 2019 Nov 4.
6
An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry: a new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):808-14. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0191.
7
Measuring adverse events in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool.
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017 Aug 1;115(4):357-363. doi: 10.5546/aap.2017.eng.357.
8
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
10
The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: Validation and Testing to Optimize Yield.
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-1290. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of the development and use of a Paediatric Oncology Trigger Tool.
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 15;14(2):e003306. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003306.
3
Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety Tool for identifying safety incidents in pediatric patients.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023 May 15;41:e2022076. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2022076. eCollection 2023.
4
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Predicting adverse drug events in older inpatients: a machine learning study.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Dec;44(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01468-7. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
6
Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2202-2211. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab121.
7
Predicting Adverse Drug Events in Chinese Pediatric Inpatients With the Associated Risk Factors: A Machine Learning Study.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 27;12:659099. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.659099. eCollection 2021.
9
Development of a trigger tool for the detection of adverse drug events in Chinese geriatric inpatients using the Delphi method.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Oct;41(5):1174-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00871-x. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
10
Reclaiming the systems approach to paediatric safety.
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1130-1133. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316401. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The burden of harm.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jul;39(7):291. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39040-0.
2
Automated detection of adverse events in children.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;59(6):1269-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
3
Measuring adverse events and levels of harm in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool.
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1206-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0179. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
Adverse events among children in Canadian hospitals: the Canadian Paediatric Adverse Events Study.
CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18;184(13):E709-18. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.112153. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
5
Deciphering harm measurement.
JAMA. 2012 May 23;307(20):2155-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3649.
6
Comparison of computerized surveillance and manual chart review for adverse events.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):491-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000187.
7
Description of the development and validation of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):416-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.041152. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
8
Variation in the rates of adverse events between hospitals and hospital departments.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):126-33. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq086. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
9
Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2124-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404.
10
Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):435-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.031393. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验