Darkins Adam, Kendall Stephen, Edmonson Ellen, Young Michele, Stressel Pamela
1 Telehealth Services , Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC.
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Jan;21(1):70-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0067. Epub 2014 May 19.
This retrospective analysis of 2009-2012 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative data assessed the efficacy of care coordination home telehealth (CCHT), a model of care designed to reduce institutional care.
Outcomes for 4,999 CCHT-non-institutional care (NIC) patients were compared with usual (non-CCHT) care in a matched cohort group (MCG) of 183,872 Veterans. Both cohorts were comprised of patients with complex chronic conditions with statistically similar baseline (pre-CCHT enrollment) healthcare costs, when adjusted for age, sex, chronic disease, emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admissions, hospital lengths of stay, and pharmacy costs.
Subsequent analyses after 12 months of CCHT-NIC enrollment showed mean annual healthcare costs for CCHT-NIC patients fell 4%, from $21,071 to $20,206, whereas the corresponding costs for MCG patients increased 48%, from $20,937 to $31,055. Higher mean annual pharmacy expenditure of 22% ($470 over baseline) for CCHT-NIC patients versus 15% for MCG patients ($326 over baseline) was attributable to the medication compliance effect of better care coordination. Several healthcare cost drivers (e.g., ER visits and admissions) had sizable declines in the CCHT-NIC group. Medicare usage review in both cohorts excluded this as a confounding factor in cost analyses. Prefinal case selection criteria analysis of both cohorts yielded a 9.8% mortality rate in CCHT patients versus 16.58% in non-CCHT patients.
This study corroborates previous positive VHA analyses of CCHT but contradicts results from recent non-VHA studies, highlighting the efficacy of the VHA's standardized CCHT model, which incorporates a biopsychosocial approach to care that emphasizes patient self-management.
本项对2009 - 2012年退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)管理数据的回顾性分析评估了护理协调家庭远程医疗(CCHT)的效果,这是一种旨在减少机构护理的护理模式。
将4999名接受CCHT - 非机构护理(NIC)的患者的结果与183872名退伍军人的匹配队列组(MCG)中的常规(非CCHT)护理进行比较。两个队列均由患有复杂慢性病的患者组成,在根据年龄、性别、慢性病、急诊室(ER)就诊次数、住院次数、住院时长和药房费用进行调整后,其基线(CCHT登记前)医疗费用在统计学上相似。
CCHT - NIC登记12个月后的后续分析显示,CCHT - NIC患者的年均医疗费用下降了4%,从21071美元降至20206美元,而MCG患者的相应费用增加了48%,从20937美元增至31055美元。CCHT - NIC患者的年均药房支出比基线高出22%(470美元),而MCG患者为15%(比基线高出326美元),这归因于更好的护理协调带来的药物依从性效果。CCHT - NIC组中几个医疗费用驱动因素(如急诊室就诊和住院)有大幅下降。两个队列中的医疗保险使用审查排除了这作为成本分析中的一个混杂因素。对两个队列的最终病例选择标准分析显示,CCHT患者的死亡率为9.8%,而非CCHT患者为16.58%。
本研究证实了VHA先前对CCHT的积极分析,但与近期非VHA研究的结果相矛盾,突出了VHA标准化CCHT模式的有效性,该模式采用了强调患者自我管理的生物心理社会护理方法。