Tesfaye Solomon
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
J Diabetes Investig. 2011 Jan 24;2(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00083.x.
There is now little doubt that poor blood glucose control is an important risk factor for the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Furthermore, traditional cardiovascular risk factors for macrovascular disease appear to be associated with an increased risk of DPN. The recently established International Expert Group on Diabetic Neuropathy has recommended new criteria for the diagnosis of DPN in the context of clinical and research settings. Studies in experimental diabetes examining the pathogenesis of DPN have identified a number of metabolic abnormalities including polyol pathway hyperactivity, increased advanced glycation end-point formation, alterations in the protein kinase C beta pathway through diacylglycerol and oxidative stress. There is now strong evidence implicating nerve ischemia as the cause of DPN. Studies in human and animal models have shown reduced nerve perfusion and endoneurial hypoxia. These endoneurial microvascular changes strongly correlate with clinical severity and the degree of nerve-fiber pathology. Unfortunately, many compounds that have been effective in animal models of neuropathy have not been successful in human diabetic neuropathy. The only compounds found to be efficacious in human diabetic neuropathy, and are in clinical use, are the anti-oxidant, α-lipoic acid and the aldose reductase inhibitor, epalrestat. Overall, the evidence emphasizes the importance of vascular dysfunction, driven by metabolic change, in the etiology of DPN, and highlights potential therapeutic approaches. Epidemiological data on diabetic painful neuropathic pain (DPNP) are limited. In one population-based study, the prevalence of DPNP, as assessed by a structured questionnaire and examination, was estimated at 16%. It was notable that, of these patients, 12.5% had never reported symptoms to their doctor and 39% had never received treatment for their pain. Thus, despite being common, DPNP continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. Pharmacological treatment of DPNP include tricyclic compounds, serotonin noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors, the anti-oxidant α-lipoic acid, anticonvulsants, opiates, membrane stabilizers, topical capsaicin and so on. Management of the patient with DPNP must be tailored to individual requirements and will depend on the presence of other comorbidities. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00083.x).
目前几乎可以确定,血糖控制不佳是糖尿病性周围神经病变(DPN)发生的一个重要危险因素。此外,传统的大血管疾病心血管危险因素似乎与DPN风险增加相关。最近成立的糖尿病神经病变国际专家组推荐了在临床和研究环境中诊断DPN的新标准。在实验性糖尿病中研究DPN发病机制的研究已经确定了一些代谢异常,包括多元醇途径活性亢进、晚期糖基化终产物形成增加、通过二酰基甘油的蛋白激酶Cβ途径改变以及氧化应激。现在有强有力的证据表明神经缺血是DPN的病因。在人类和动物模型中的研究表明神经灌注减少和神经内膜缺氧。这些神经内膜微血管变化与临床严重程度和神经纤维病理程度密切相关。不幸的是,许多在神经病变动物模型中有效的化合物在人类糖尿病神经病变中并未成功。在人类糖尿病神经病变中被发现有效且正在临床使用的唯一化合物是抗氧化剂α-硫辛酸和醛糖还原酶抑制剂依帕司他。总体而言,证据强调了由代谢变化驱动的血管功能障碍在DPN病因中的重要性,并突出了潜在的治疗方法。关于糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变(DPNP)的流行病学数据有限。在一项基于人群的研究中,通过结构化问卷和检查评估的DPNP患病率估计为16%。值得注意的是,在这些患者中,12.5%从未向医生报告过症状,39%从未接受过疼痛治疗。因此,尽管DPNP很常见,但仍然诊断不足和治疗不足。DPNP的药物治疗包括三环类化合物、5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂、抗氧化剂α-硫辛酸、抗惊厥药、阿片类药物、膜稳定剂、局部辣椒素等。DPNP患者的管理必须根据个体需求进行调整,并将取决于是否存在其他合并症。(《糖尿病研究杂志》,doi:10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00083.x)