Piantieri G, Lombardo F, Pedersoli G, Vanini G F, Banfi F
Ann Ig. 1989 Nov-Dec;1(6):1427-30.
Syphilis is still a quite common infection often lacking clinical symptoms and sometimes ignored. Serological tests have peculiar importance in order to settle the diagnosis and therapy. Traditional tests as VDRL and TPHA cannot clearly define the clinical pattern because these tests remain positive for a long period of time. Moreover they can prove the recovery of the patients only if they continue to give low titres. The immunofluorescence test FTA ABS, that raised interest at its outset, has low sensitivity against IgM specific antibodies and defines serological state of patients only in 50% of the cases. The reading of this test remains subjective. The authors intend to verify the importance to detect the IgM specific antibodies to assume medical and legal decisions in unknown subjects, without clinical knowledge. 20,000 sera of normal subjects and of risk group have been assayed. Specific IgM are absent in 60 clinically recovered subjects with VDRL and TPHA still positive, specific IgM are present in 15 cases of Syphilis under treatment and also in 15 subjects with unknown Syphilis. The results show that: 1) IgM specific antibodies for Syphilis are not detectable in patients under a long term antibiotic treatment while the traditional serological tests (VDRL, TPHA) are positive; 2) they are present in patients under treatment with still active infection; 3) they are also present in patients with ignored infection, never treated. In conclusion the Authors consider important to include in the panel of Syphilis testing new assays for the detection of specific IgM antibodies. This is particularly important in subjects under treatment and also in unknown subjects.
梅毒仍然是一种相当常见的感染,常常没有临床症状,有时会被忽视。血清学检测对于确诊和治疗至关重要。传统检测方法如性病研究实验室试验(VDRL)和梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA)无法明确界定临床症状,因为这些检测会在很长一段时间内保持阳性。此外,只有当它们持续呈现低滴度时,才能证明患者已经康复。一开始引起人们兴趣的免疫荧光试验荧光螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA-ABS),对IgM特异性抗体的敏感性较低,仅在50%的病例中能确定患者的血清学状态。该检测结果的判读仍然主观。作者旨在验证检测IgM特异性抗体对于在不了解临床情况的未知个体中做出医疗和法律决策的重要性。对20000份正常人和高危人群的血清进行了检测。在60例临床已康复但VDRL和TPHA仍为阳性的受试者中未检测到特异性IgM,在15例正在接受治疗的梅毒患者以及15例不明梅毒患者中检测到了特异性IgM。结果表明:1)长期接受抗生素治疗的患者,其梅毒特异性IgM抗体检测不到,而传统血清学检测(VDRL、TPHA)呈阳性;2)正在接受治疗且感染仍活跃的患者体内存在特异性IgM抗体;3)从未接受治疗的被忽视感染患者体内也存在特异性IgM抗体。总之,作者认为在梅毒检测项目中纳入检测特异性IgM抗体的新检测方法很重要。这在正在接受治疗的患者以及不明情况的个体中尤为重要。