Ahmedani Brian K, Peterson Edward L, Wells Karen E, Lanfear David E, Williams L Keoki
Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI; Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Pain Physician. 2014 May-Jun;17(3):205-16.
Rising prescription opioid use and abuse have prompted widespread concern. However, to date there have been few rigorous investigations into the policies and events which may have contributed to these trends.
This study investigates trends in opioid use and related adverse events among individuals with non-cancer pain before and after implementation of major national policies.
The study used a longitudinal prospective study design. The analysis was limited to adults (age = 18 years) without a recorded cancer diagnosis. Pharmacy claims were used to assess rates of prescription opioid use, the strength of opioids dispensed, the proportion using opioids chronically, and related adverse events. Time trend analysis was used to identify changes in these rates over time. The study was Institutional Review Board approved.
Study patients were members of a large, health maintenance organization in southeast Michigan, with longitudinal records of prescription opioid use.
The analysis comprised 523,623 individuals and 1,066,700 opioid pharmacy fills from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2011. Contemporaneous with the implementation of health organization accreditation criteria requiring assessment and treatment of pain in all patients beginning January 2001, we observed a consistent and unabated increase in the rate of opioid fills and the proportion of chronic use. A parallel increase in the annual rate of adverse events was also observed. Similarly, we observed a continuous rise in the average strength of opioid fills following January 2001 with the exception of a single drop in December 2010, which was attributable to the withdrawal of propoxyphene from the U.S. market.
This was an observational study and not a trial. Other long-term opioid-related benefits or harms, including functional status, quality of life, and substance use disorder, were not assessed.
This study provides temporal evidence for a rise in prescription opioid use after implementation of health organization accreditation criteria requiring standardized management of all individuals with pain.
处方阿片类药物使用及滥用情况不断增加,引发了广泛关注。然而,迄今为止,对于可能导致这些趋势的政策和事件,鲜有严格的调查。
本研究调查在国家主要政策实施前后,非癌性疼痛患者中阿片类药物使用趋势及相关不良事件。
本研究采用纵向前瞻性研究设计。分析仅限于未记录癌症诊断的成年人(年龄≥18岁)。利用药房报销数据评估处方阿片类药物使用率、所配发阿片类药物的强度、长期使用阿片类药物的比例以及相关不良事件。采用时间趋势分析来确定这些比率随时间的变化。本研究经机构审查委员会批准。
研究患者为密歇根州东南部一家大型健康维护组织的成员,有阿片类药物处方使用的纵向记录。
分析涵盖了1997年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间的523,623名个体及1,066,700次阿片类药物药房配药。与2001年1月开始实施的要求对所有患者进行疼痛评估和治疗的健康组织认证标准同步,我们观察到阿片类药物配药率和长期使用率持续且未减的增长。不良事件年发生率也出现了平行增长。同样,2001年1月之后,除了2010年12月因丙氧芬退出美国市场出现一次下降外,阿片类药物配药的平均强度持续上升。
这是一项观察性研究而非试验。未评估其他与阿片类药物相关的长期益处或危害,包括功能状态、生活质量和物质使用障碍。
本研究为实施要求对所有疼痛个体进行标准化管理的健康组织认证标准后处方阿片类药物使用增加提供了时间证据。