Suppr超能文献

需要有先前阿片类药物耐受史的潜在不适当处方阿片类镇痛药的评估。

Assessment of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing of Opioid Analgesics Requiring Prior Opioid Tolerance.

机构信息

Division of Health Care Policy Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2875.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Opioid-tolerant only (OTO) medications, such as transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl products and certain extended-release opioid analgesics, require prior opioid tolerance for safe use, as patients without tolerance may be at increased risk of overdose. Studies using insurance claims have found that many patients initiating these medications do not appear to be opioid tolerant.

OBJECTIVES

To measure prevalence of opioid tolerance in patients initiating OTO medications and to determine whether linked electronic health record (EHR) data contribute evidence of opioid tolerance not found in insurance claims data.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used a national database of deidentified longitudinal health information, including medical and pharmacy claims, insurance enrollment, and EHR data, from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016. Data included 131 756 US residents with at least 183 days of continuous enrollment in commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance (including medical and pharmacy benefits) who had received an OTO medication and who had no inpatient stays in the 30 days prior to starting an OTO medication; of these, 20 044 individuals had linked EHR data within the prior 183 days. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018.

EXPOSURES

Initiating an OTO medication.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prior opioid tolerance demonstrated through pharmacy fills or EHR data on prescriptions written.

RESULTS

Among 153 385 OTO use episodes identified, 89 029 (58.0%) occurred among women, 62 900 (41.0%) occurred among patients with Medicare Advantage insurance, 39 394 (25.7%) occurred in the Midwest, 17 366 (11.3%) occurred in the Northeast, 73 316 (47.8%) occurred in the South, and 23 309 (15.2%) occurred in the West. Less than half of use episodes (73 117 episodes [47.7%]) involved patients with evidence in claims data of opioid tolerance prior to initiating therapy with an OTO medication, including 31 392 of 101 676 episodes (30.9%) involving transdermal fentanyl, 1561 of 2440 episodes (64.0%) involving transmucosal fentanyl, 36 596 of 43 559 episodes (84.0%) involving extended-release oxycodone, and 3568 of 5710 episodes (62.5%) involving extended-release hydromorphone. Among 20 044 OTO use episodes with linked EHR and claims data, less than 1% of OTO episodes identified in claims had evidence of opioid tolerance in structured EHR data that was not present in claims data (108 episodes [0.5%]). After limiting the sample to OTO episodes identified in claims with a matching OTO prescription within 14 days in the structured EHR data, only 40 of 939 episodes (4.0%) occurred among patients with evidence of tolerance that was not present in claims data.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that most patients initiating OTO medications did not have evidence of prior opioid tolerance, suggesting they were at increased risk of opioid-related harms, including fatal overdose. Data from EHRs did not contribute substantial additional evidence of opioid tolerance beyond the data found in prescription claims. Future research is needed to understand the clinical rationale behind these observed prescribing patterns and to quantify the risk of harm to patients associated with potentially inappropriate prescribing.

摘要

重要性:只有耐受阿片类药物的药物(OTO),如粘膜即刻释放芬太尼产品和某些延长释放阿片类镇痛药,需要在安全使用前有阿片类药物耐受,因为没有耐受的患者可能有更高的过量风险。使用保险索赔的研究发现,许多开始使用这些药物的患者似乎没有阿片类药物耐受。

目的:测量开始使用 OTO 药物的患者中阿片类药物耐受的流行程度,并确定链接的电子健康记录(EHR)数据是否提供了在保险索赔数据中未发现的阿片类药物耐受的证据。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了一个国家的匿名纵向健康信息数据库,包括 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日的医疗和药房索赔、保险登记和 EHR 数据,来自至少有 183 天商业或医疗保险优势保险(包括医疗和药房福利)连续入组的 131756 名美国居民,这些居民接受了 OTO 药物治疗,在开始使用 OTO 药物的 30 天内没有住院;其中,20044 人在之前的 183 天内有链接的 EHR 数据。数据于 2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 8 月 31 日进行分析。

暴露:开始使用 OTO 药物。

主要结果和措施:通过药房填充或 EHR 数据记录的先前阿片类药物耐受。

结果:在确定的 153385 次 OTO 使用发作中,89029 次(58.0%)发生在女性中,62900 次(41.0%)发生在医疗保险优势保险患者中,39394 次(25.7%)发生在中西部,17366 次(11.3%)发生在东北部,73316 次(47.8%)发生在南部,23309 次(15.2%)发生在西部。不到一半的使用发作(73117 次发作[47.7%])涉及在开始 OTO 药物治疗前有证据表明在索赔数据中有阿片类药物耐受的患者,其中 31392 次发作(30.9%)涉及透皮芬太尼,1561 次发作(64.0%)涉及粘膜芬太尼,36596 次发作(84.0%)涉及延长释放羟考酮,3568 次发作(62.5%)涉及延长释放氢吗啡酮。在 20044 次与 EHR 和索赔数据相关联的 OTO 使用发作中,索赔数据中确定的不到 1%的 OTO 发作在结构 EHR 数据中有证据表明阿片类药物耐受,但在索赔数据中没有。在将样本限制为在索赔数据中有匹配的 OTO 处方且在结构 EHR 数据中在 14 天内的 OTO 发作后,只有 939 次发作中的 40 次(4.0%)发生在没有在索赔数据中发现的耐受证据的患者中。

结论和相关性:这项队列研究发现,大多数开始使用 OTO 药物的患者没有先前阿片类药物耐受的证据,这表明他们有更高的阿片类药物相关伤害风险,包括致命过量。EHR 数据没有提供除处方索赔数据中发现的以外的大量额外阿片类药物耐受证据。需要进一步研究了解这些观察到的处方模式背后的临床原理,并量化与潜在不适当处方相关的患者伤害风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74d2/7160686/21715f9de423/jamanetwopen-3-e202875-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验