[补体结合反应与间接免疫荧光反应在Q热检测中的比较价值]
[Comparative value of complement fixation and indirect immunofluorescence reactions for the detection of Q fever].
作者信息
Chavanet P, Pechinot A, Lobjoy B, Portier H
出版信息
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1984 Jan;32(1):53-5.
PMID:6366707
Abstract
1 052 serum samples from 1 013 persons living in rural areas, were tested by IF and CF; with the IF-test, 4% of them were sero-positive (titer greater than or equal to: 20). IF-tests are eightfold more sensitive than CF tests and have at least the same specificity. The results of two (commercial) Coxiella burnetii phase II antigens were compared.
摘要
对来自1013名农村居民的1052份血清样本进行了间接免疫荧光试验（IF）和补体结合试验（CF）检测；通过间接免疫荧光试验，其中4%的样本血清呈阳性（滴度大于或等于20）。间接免疫荧光试验的敏感性比补体结合试验高八倍，且至少具有相同的特异性。比较了两种（市售）伯氏考克斯氏体II期抗原的检测结果。
Zotero 插件