• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吻合器击发次数对腹腔镜直肠手术吻合口漏的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, C/San Clemente no. 12, 46015, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):919-925. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02240-7. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-020-02240-7
PMID:32451807
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several univariate and multivariate studies have already identified the number of stapler firings for laparoscopic rectal transection for rectal cancer as an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the anastomotic leakage rate in laparoscopic rectal surgery according to the need of using one or two stapler firings for rectal transection.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid, the Cochrane Library database and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. All of the statistical analyses were performed using Revman software.

RESULTS

Five studies were included (1267 patients). The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5.5% [0.7-8.4%]. Anastomotic leak occurred in 3.5% (17/491) of the cases where 1 stapler firing was used versus 6.7% (50/786) of the cases in which 2 firings were needed (50/786). Two stapler firings were significantly associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.34-4.42, p = 0.003, I = 1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that two firings imply a higher rate of anastomotic leak than a single firing after laparoscopic rectal surgery with a double stapling technique. Coloproctologists should strive to reduce the number of linear stapler firings and try to transect the rectum with a single firing.

摘要

背景

几项单变量和多变量研究已经确定,用于腹腔镜直肠切除直肠癌的吻合器击发次数是吻合口漏的独立危险因素。本研究旨在对腹腔镜直肠手术中根据直肠横断需要使用一次或两次吻合器击发来评估吻合口漏发生率进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

检索了 PubMed、Ovid、Cochrane 图书馆数据库和 ClinicalTrials.gov。所有的统计分析均使用 Revman 软件进行。

结果

共纳入 5 项研究(1267 例患者)。总的吻合口漏发生率为 5.5%[0.7-8.4%]。使用 1 次吻合器击发时吻合口漏发生率为 3.5%(17/491),使用 2 次吻合器击发时吻合口漏发生率为 6.7%(50/786)。2 次吻合器击发与吻合口漏风险增加显著相关(OR 2.44,95%CI 1.34-4.42,p=0.003,I=1%)。

结论

我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,与使用双吻合器技术行腹腔镜直肠手术后单次吻合器击发相比,两次吻合器击发会导致更高的吻合口漏发生率。结直肠外科医生应努力减少吻合器击发次数,并尝试通过单次击发来横断直肠。

相似文献

1
Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.吻合器击发次数对腹腔镜直肠手术吻合口漏的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):919-925. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02240-7. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.多次使用吻合器切割直肠对结直肠吻合口漏发生率的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5318-5326. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5611-0. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis.腹腔镜低位前切除联合DST吻合术后吻合口漏的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2988-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0. Epub 2014 May 23.
4
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique.腹腔镜经肛直肠端端吻合术中双吻合器技术吻合口漏的危险因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Dec;209(6):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.021.
5
Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection.腹腔镜直肠切除术中直肠离断时吻合器击发次数与吻合口漏的关系
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jul;23(7):703-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0470-8. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
6
Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Two Planned Stapler Fires.腹腔镜低位前切除术并计划进行两次吻合器击发。
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00112.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model to predict multiple firings in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis.基于磁共振成像的深度学习模型预测双钉结直肠吻合术的多次吻合。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 21;29(3):536-548. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i3.536.
8
Higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and multiple stapler firings for rectal transection are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer.改良格拉斯哥预后评分较高和多次吻合器吻合是直肠癌低位前切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素。
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 22;66(1):10-16. doi: 10.5387/fms.2019-17. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
9
Predictive risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer in elderly patients over 80 years old: an analysis of 288 consecutive patients.80 岁以上老年患者直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏的预测风险因素:288 例连续患者分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 29;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1655-z.
10
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery with the double stapling technique for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial.腹腔镜双吻合器技术治疗0/I期直肠癌术后吻合口漏的危险因素:一项多中心单臂II期试验的亚组分析
Surg Today. 2017 Oct;47(10):1215-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1496-8. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery.预防吻合口漏,结直肠手术的一种毁灭性并发症。
Ewha Med J. 2023 Dec;46(Suppl 1):e29. doi: 10.12771/emj.2023.e29. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
2
Perioperative safety evaluation of intersphincteric resection combined with rectal eversion and total extra-abdominal resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial.括约肌间切除术联合直肠外翻及全腹外切除术的围手术期安全性评估:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 18;23(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03952-6.
3
A novel technique for low-rectal cancer: Pushing the anus in laparoscopic radical resection.
一种治疗低位直肠癌的新技术:腹腔镜根治性切除术中的肛门内推法
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 4;104(27):e43267. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043267.
4
Comparative Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Mid-to-low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Study on Complications and Permanent Stoma Rates.机器人辅助腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较结果:一项关于并发症和永久性造口率的倾向评分匹配研究
In Vivo. 2025 Jul-Aug;39(4):2387-2396. doi: 10.21873/invivo.14037.
5
Development and validation of an anastomotic risk score for use in a randomized clinical trial on defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.用于直肠癌低位前切除术预防性造口使用的随机临床试验的吻合口风险评分的开发与验证
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr;27(4):e70089. doi: 10.1111/codi.70089.
6
Predicting Surgical Difficulty in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models Applied to Pre-Operative MRI.预测直肠癌手术的难度:应用于术前MRI的人工智能模型的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;17(5):812. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050812.
7
Effect of anastomotic reinforcement with barded suture on anastomotic leakage prevention following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.带倒刺缝线吻合口加固对直肠癌腹腔镜低位前切除术后预防吻合口漏的影响:一项回顾性单中心研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02749-w.
8
The impact of transanal drainage tube on the incidence of anastomotic leakage and small bowel obstruction in radical surgery (Dixon) for rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.经肛门引流管对直肠癌根治术(迪克森术)中吻合口漏和小肠梗阻发生率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Aug 31;15(4):1508-1518. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-537. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
9
The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries.电动圆形吻合器对左半结直肠癌手术吻合口漏的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6111-6119. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11215-w. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
10
Analysis of decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery and their impact on perioperative recovery: a retrospective study of 1082 patients.直肠癌术后预防性回肠造口还纳决策因素分析及其对围手术期恢复的影响:1082 例患者的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6782-6792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11149-3. Epub 2024 Aug 19.