Taylor Ruth, Macduff Colin, Stephen Audrey
Anglia Ruskin University, Faculty of Health Social Care and Education, Chelmsford Campus, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM 1SQ.
Robert Gordon University.
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Aug;34(8):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 May 6.
This paper presents the main findings from a project that aimed to evaluate selection processes for the recruitment of student nurses and midwives.
The main objectives were to: Design The evaluation was designed principally to achieve explanation, with multiple case study methodology adopted as the main approach. Within this ambit mixed methods of data collection involving questionnaires and interviews were used. Participants Seven of the Scotland-based Higher Education Institutions participated in the research, with participation from Admissions Tutors, clinical interviewers, academic interviewers, and students.
The methods included: a scoping questionnaire with follow-on questionnaire to elicit views on the strengths and limitations of chosen selection processes; interviews and focus groups to build on these findings. Analytical approaches were congruent with the chosen data collection approaches. Findings HEIs typically have rationales for their various chosen approaches to selection. However, our findings indicate that there is a lack of evidence for most selection approaches particularly in relation to interviewing. There is a growing evidence-base for the use of multiple mini interviews, and emotional intelligence testing.
There is a need to work collectively cross-UK to bring together the evidence-base around selection so that processes and decision-making are as valid, reliable, effective and transparent as possible.
本文介绍了一个旨在评估学生护士和助产士招聘选拔流程的项目的主要研究结果。
主要目的是：设计 该评估主要旨在进行解释，采用多案例研究方法作为主要途径。在此范围内，使用了包括问卷调查和访谈在内的混合数据收集方法。参与者 苏格兰的七所高等教育机构参与了该研究，招生导师、临床面试官、学术面试官和学生均参与其中。
方法包括：一份范围界定问卷及后续问卷，以征集对所选选拔流程的优势和局限性的看法；基于这些结果进行访谈和焦点小组讨论。分析方法与所选数据收集方法一致。研究结果 高等教育机构通常对其各种所选选拔方法有理论依据。然而，我们的研究结果表明，大多数选拔方法缺乏证据，尤其是在面试方面。使用多重迷你面试和情商测试的证据基础正在不断扩大。
有必要在英国范围内共同努力，汇集有关选拔的证据基础，以便选拔流程和决策尽可能有效、可靠、高效和透明。
