• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人陈述与心理测试在护理学位入学中的比较:一项评估。

Personal statement versus psychological test as admission to the nursing degree: an evaluation.

作者信息

Traynor Marian, Neill Colin Mc, Roulston Audrey

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, N. Ireland.

Identity Exploration Ltd, 50 Stranmillis Embankment, Belfast, Co Antrim, N. Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 17;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00919-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-022-00919-w
PMID:35715840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9204378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A review of admissions to nursing in Northern Ireland was prompted by the growing number of applications and a desire to ensure that the applicants had the right values for a career in nursing. Concerns regarding authorship, plagiarism and reliability of personal statements used to select applicants to interview was the focus of this research. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of a Personal Statement (PS) as a method for admission to a nursing programme and a values-based psychological screening tool, Nurse Match (NM).

METHODS

A self-selecting, purposive sample (n = 228; 9.7%) was drawn from applicants to Schools of Nursing in the United Kingdom (n = 2350). Participants all of whom had completed a Personal Statement were asked to complete a psychological tool and the scoring outcomes and psychometric properties of both tests were investigated. Statistical analysis was conducted using Minitab 17.

RESULTS

Applicants from 18 schools and five colleges responded. The majority (72.4%) were aged 18-19. Findings provide practical, theoretical, statistical, and qualitative reasons for concluding that the Personal Statement has substantial limitations as a measure of suitability. It does not compare well with international test standards for psychometric tests. In contrast, NM is a valid and reliable measure with good discriminatory power, standardised administration and consistent marking.

CONCLUSION

NM is a viable alternative to the PS for shortlisting applicants for nursing interviews.

摘要

背景

由于申请护理专业的人数不断增加,且希望确保申请者具备从事护理职业所需的正确价值观,因此对北爱尔兰护理专业招生情况进行了审查。本研究的重点是对用于选拔面试申请者的个人陈述的作者身份、抄袭问题及可靠性的担忧。本研究评估了个人陈述(PS)作为护理专业入学方法及基于价值观的心理筛查工具“护士匹配”(NM)的心理测量特性。

方法

从英国护理学院的申请者中抽取了一个自我选择的目的样本(n = 228;9.7%)(申请者总数n = 2350)。所有完成个人陈述的参与者都被要求完成一项心理测试工具,并对两项测试的评分结果和心理测量特性进行调查。使用Minitab 17进行统计分析。

结果

来自18所学校和5所学院的申请者做出了回应。大多数(72.4%)年龄在18 - 19岁之间。研究结果提供了实践、理论、统计和定性方面的理由,可据此得出结论:个人陈述作为衡量适用性的方法存在重大局限性。它与心理测量测试的国际标准相比表现不佳。相比之下,“护士匹配”是一种有效且可靠的测量方法,具有良好的区分能力、标准化管理和一致的评分。

结论

“护士匹配”是用于筛选护理面试申请者的个人陈述的可行替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/ecda6b943fb0/12912_2022_919_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/536e8580025b/12912_2022_919_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/310c0ea7bccc/12912_2022_919_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/ecda6b943fb0/12912_2022_919_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/536e8580025b/12912_2022_919_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/310c0ea7bccc/12912_2022_919_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8718/9204897/ecda6b943fb0/12912_2022_919_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Personal statement versus psychological test as admission to the nursing degree: an evaluation.个人陈述与心理测试在护理学位入学中的比较:一项评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 17;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00919-w.
2
Development and psychometric testing of an instrument to measure applicants' desire to work in nursing.测量申请人从事护理工作意愿的工具的开发和心理计量学测试。
Contemp Nurse. 2023 Apr;59(2):153-172. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2023.2200014. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
Developing nurse match: A selection tool for evoking and scoring an applicant's nursing values and attributes.开发护士匹配工具:一种用于激发和评估申请人护理价值观及特质的选拔工具。
Nurs Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(1):59-71. doi: 10.1002/nop2.183. eCollection 2019 Jan.
4
Design and implementation of an online admissions interview for selection to nursing and midwifery programmes: a partnership approach.护理与助产专业课程入学在线面试的设计与实施:一种合作方法
BMC Nurs. 2022 Oct 17;21(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01058-y.
5
Trends in Pharmacy College Admission Test Requirements and Utilization Across Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy.药学专业学院入学考试要求和利用的趋势在学院和药学院校之间。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):8179. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8179. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
6
Perception of nursing profession - focus group interview among applicants to nursing education.对护理专业的认知——护理教育申请者焦点小组访谈
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Jun;33(2):390-399. doi: 10.1111/scs.12635. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?英国大学临床能力倾向测验(UKCAT)与英国医学生选拔——自2006年以来有哪些变化?
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 5;20(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1.
9
A qualitative analysis of statements on motivation of applicants for medical school.对医学院校申请者动机陈述的定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 23;14:200. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-200.
10
Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study.基于网络的面试与面对面面试在麻醉学培训项目申请中的比较:一项试点研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 3;7:102-8. doi: 10.5116/ijme.56e5.491a.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring available admission criteria for a bachelor of science in nursing/midwifery: a scoping review.探索护理学/助产学理学学士学位的可用入学标准:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 13;24(1):1067. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03661-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Opening Editorial: Selection and Recruitment in Medical Education.开篇社论:医学教育中的选拔与招生
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Oct 1;7:222. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000222.1. eCollection 2018.
2
An exploration of the predictive validity of selection criteria on progress outcomes for pre-registration nursing programmes-A systematic review.探索预注册护理课程选择标准对进步结果的预测有效性——系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Sep;30(17-18):2489-2513. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15730. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
A scoping review of admission criteria and selection methods in nursing education.
护理教育中入学标准与选拔方法的范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2020 Dec 14;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00510-1.
4
Undergraduate nursing program admission criteria: A scoping review of the literature.本科护理专业入学标准:文献综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104519. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104519. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
Developing nurse match: A selection tool for evoking and scoring an applicant's nursing values and attributes.开发护士匹配工具:一种用于激发和评估申请人护理价值观及特质的选拔工具。
Nurs Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(1):59-71. doi: 10.1002/nop2.183. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
2018 Ottawa consensus statement: Selection and recruitment to the healthcare professions.2018 年渥太华共识声明:医疗保健专业的选拔和招募。
Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1091-1101. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1498589. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
Innovation in values based public health nursing student selection: A qualitative evaluation of candidate and selection panel member perspectives.基于价值观的公共卫生护理专业学生选拔创新:对候选人及选拔小组成员观点的质性评估
Public Health Nurs. 2018 Jul;35(4):344-352. doi: 10.1111/phn.12392. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
8
How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.医学教育中的选择方法有多有效?系统评价。
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12817.
9
Recruiting for values in healthcare: a preliminary review of the evidence.医疗保健领域的价值观招募:证据的初步综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Oct;21(4):859-81. doi: 10.1007/s10459-014-9579-4. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
10
A national study of selection processes for student nurses and midwives.一项针对学生护士和助产士选拔流程的全国性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Aug;34(8):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 May 6.