• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用多站面试作为正在完成国际健康选修课程的医学生候选人的预筛选工具。

Using multiple mini interviews as a pre-screening tool for medical student candidates completing international health electives.

机构信息

a Center for Global Health Education, University of Texas Medical Branch , Texas , Galveston , US.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1483694. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1483694.

DOI:10.1080/10872981.2018.1483694
PMID:29912657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6008579/
Abstract

There continues to be an increase in the number of learners who participate in international health electives (IHEs). However, not all learners enter IHEs with the same level of knowledge, attitude, and previous experience, which puts undue burden on host supervisors and poses risks to student and patient safety. The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is a technique that has become a popular method for undergraduate and postgraduate-level health science admissions programs. This paper describes the MMI process used by our program to screen first-year medical students applying for pre-clinical IHEs. Two country-specific cases were developed to assess non-cognitive skills. One hundred percent (100%) of the students (n = 48) and interviewers (n = 10) who participated in MMIs completed anonymous surveys on their experience. The majority of students rated the scenarios as realistic (>90%); 96% found the MMI format fair and balanced; 96% of students felt that they were able to clearly articulate their thoughts; 75% of students stated that they had a general understanding of how the MMIs worked; only 33% of students would have preferred a traditional one-to-one interview. Feedback from both interviewers and students was positive toward the MMI experience, and no students were identified as unfit for participation. Ultimately, 43 students participated in pre-clinical IHEs in 2016. In this paper, we will outline our MMI process, detail shortcomings, and discuss our next steps to screen medical students for IHEs.

摘要

参加国际健康选修课程(IHE)的学习者人数持续增加。然而,并非所有学习者都具有相同的知识、态度和先前经验水平,这给东道主导师带来了不必要的负担,并对学生和患者的安全构成了风险。多站式面试(MMI)是一种已成为本科和研究生健康科学招生计划中流行方法的技术。本文描述了我们的计划用于筛选申请临床前 IHE 的一年级医学生的 MMI 流程。为了评估非认知技能,我们开发了两个具有国情特色的案例。参与 MMIs 的所有学生(n=48)和面试官(n=10)都完成了关于他们的体验的匿名调查。大多数学生认为场景逼真(>90%);96%的人认为 MMI 格式公平且平衡;96%的学生认为他们能够清楚地表达自己的想法;75%的学生表示他们对 MMIs 的工作方式有了大致的了解;只有 33%的学生更喜欢传统的一对一面试。面试官和学生对 MMI 体验的反馈均为正面,没有学生被认为不适合参与。最终,有 43 名学生在 2016 年参加了临床前 IHE。在本文中,我们将概述我们的 MMI 流程,详细说明缺点,并讨论我们筛选医学生参加 IHE 的下一步措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/6008579/78fed84c1f63/ZMEO_A_1483694_UF0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/6008579/3c54546b723d/ZMEO_A_1483694_UF0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/6008579/78fed84c1f63/ZMEO_A_1483694_UF0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/6008579/3c54546b723d/ZMEO_A_1483694_UF0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/375c/6008579/78fed84c1f63/ZMEO_A_1483694_UF0002_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Using multiple mini interviews as a pre-screening tool for medical student candidates completing international health electives.采用多站面试作为正在完成国际健康选修课程的医学生候选人的预筛选工具。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1483694. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1483694.
2
The utility of multiple mini-interviews: experience of a medical school.多次小型面试的效用:一所医学院的经验
Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Mar;29(1):7-14. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.48. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
Unchallenged good intentions: a qualitative study of the experiences of medical students on international health electives to developing countries.未受质疑的善意:对医学生参与赴发展中国家国际健康选修课程经历的定性研究
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Sep 4;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-49.
4
Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission.六站式多重迷你面试的可靠性与可接受性:研究生医学入学中过往行为问题与情境问题的比较
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z.
5
An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students.多站式面试评估作为牙科学生选拔工具的效果评价。
Br Dent J. 2012 Apr 13;212(7):331-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.267.
6
Multiple mini interview (MMI) for general practice training selection in Australia: interviewers' motivation.澳大利亚全科医学培训选拔中的多站式面试(MMI):面试官的动机。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1128-z.
7
Candidates' and interviewers' perceptions of multiple-mini interviews for admission to an occupational therapy professional program.候选人与面试官对职业治疗专业项目入学多重小型面试的看法。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2015 Apr;29(2):186-200. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1012776. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
8
The reliability and validity of multiple mini interviews (MMIs) in values based recruitment to nursing, midwifery and paramedic practice programmes: Findings from an evaluation study.多站式面试(MMI)在基于价值观的护理、助产和急救护理实践项目招聘中的可靠性和有效性:一项评估研究的结果。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
A Comparison of the Expectations and Experiences of Medical Students From High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries Participating in Global Health Clinical Electives.高收入、中等收入和低收入国家参加全球健康临床选修课程的医学生的期望与经历比较
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):45-56. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1347510. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools.多站式迷你面试与传统面试在机构内和机构间的可靠性:对加州五所医学院的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 6;17(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1030-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Electives in Sub-Saharan Africa: A 15-Year Student/NGO-Driven Initiative.撒哈拉以南非洲的医学选修课程:一项由学生/非政府组织驱动的 15 年倡议。
J Community Health. 2022 Apr;47(2):273-283. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01045-5. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Vive la Différence: The Freedom and Inherent Responsibilities When Designing and Implementing Multiple Mini-Interviews.生生不息:设计和实施多项迷你面试时的自由和固有责任。
Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):969-971. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002042.
2
Developing consensus for postgraduate global health electives: definitions, pre-departure training and post-return debriefing.为研究生全球健康选修课程达成共识:定义、出发前培训及回国后汇报
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 4;16:159. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0675-4.
3
Root Cause Analysis Design and Its Application to Pharmacy Education.
根本原因分析设计及其在药学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Sep 25;79(7):99. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79799.
4
A Hybrid Interview Model for Medical School Interviews: Combining Traditional and Multisampling Formats.一种用于医学院面试的混合面试模式:结合传统和多重抽样形式
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1526-1529. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001218.
5
Comparing the traditional and Multiple Mini Interviews in the selection of post-graduate medical trainees.比较传统面试与多重小型面试在选拔医学研究生学员中的应用。
Can Med Educ J. 2015 Dec 11;6(2):e6-e13. eCollection 2015.
6
A national study of selection processes for student nurses and midwives.一项针对学生护士和助产士选拔流程的全国性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Aug;34(8):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 May 6.
7
Acceptability and reliability of multiple mini interviews for admission to otolaryngology residency.多站式迷你面试用于耳鼻喉科住院医师录取的可接受性和可靠性。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.24122. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
8
Assessment of non-clinical attributes in paramedicine using multiple mini-interviews.使用多次迷你面试评估护理人员的非临床属性。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):70-5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202964. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
9
Are current strategies for pre-registration student nurse and student midwife selection 'fit for purpose' from a UK perspective? Introducing the multiple mini interview.从英国的角度来看,目前用于预注册学生护士和助产士选拔的策略是否“符合目的”?引入多重迷你面试。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Nov;32(8):835-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.019. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
10
An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students.多站式面试评估作为牙科学生选拔工具的效果评价。
Br Dent J. 2012 Apr 13;212(7):331-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.267.