• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Persistence and compliance with pazopanib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma within a U.S. administrative claims database.在美国行政索赔数据库中,晚期肾细胞癌患者使用帕唑帕尼的持续性和依从性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Jun;20(6):603-10. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.6.603.
2
Persistence and compliance among U.S. patients receiving pazopanib or sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective claims analysis.美国接受帕唑帕尼或舒尼替尼作为一线治疗晚期肾细胞癌的患者的坚持性和依从性:一项回顾性索赔分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jun;21(6):515-22. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.6.515.
3
Real-World Economic Outcomes During Time on Treatment Among Patients Who Initiated Sunitinib or Pazopanib as First Targeted Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.真实世界中接受舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼作为晚期肾细胞癌一线靶向治疗的患者在治疗期间的经济学结局:基于医疗保险索赔数据的回顾性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):525-533. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.525.
4
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Costs for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Initiating Treatment with Sunitinib and Pazopanib.接受舒尼替尼和帕唑帕尼治疗的肾细胞癌患者的真实世界治疗模式和费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug;22(8):979-90. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.8.979.
5
Patterns of Care in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Among a U.S. Payer Population with Commercial or Medicare Advantage Membership.美国具有商业保险或医疗保险优势会员资格的医保人群中转移性肾细胞癌患者的护理模式
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Mar;22(3):219-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.3.219.
6
Real-World Axitinib Use in the United States: A Retrospective Study Using Linked Datasets.真实世界中阿昔替尼在美国的应用:一项使用关联数据集的回顾性研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):723-732u. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.723.
7
First-Line and Sequential Use of Pazopanib Followed by Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Therapy Among Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in a US Community Oncology Setting.美国社区肿瘤环境中晚期肾细胞癌患者一线及序贯使用帕唑帕尼后再接受雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂治疗的情况
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Jun;13(3):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
8
Adherence and persistence among chronic myeloid leukemia patients during second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.慢性髓性白血病患者在二线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗期间的依从性和持续性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Oct;20(10):1006-15. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.10.1006.
9
Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Elderly Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Starting Pazopanib or Sunitinib Treatment: A Retrospective Medicare Claims Analysis.老年晚期肾细胞癌患者起始使用帕唑帕尼或舒尼替尼治疗的临床和经济结局:一项回顾性医疗保险索赔分析。
Adv Ther. 2017 Nov;34(11):2452-2465. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0628-2. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
An Italian, multicenter, real-world, retrospective study of first-line pazopanib in unselected metastatic renal-cell carcinoma patients: the 'Pamerit' study.一项意大利、多中心、真实世界、回顾性研究,评估一线帕唑帕尼治疗未经选择的转移性肾细胞癌患者:'Pamerit'研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 3;51(3):484-491. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa193.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Patient Adherence and Persistence to Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.评估转移性肾细胞癌患者对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的依从性和持续性:真实世界数据的回顾性分析
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;19:11795549251341877. doi: 10.1177/11795549251341877. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost trends of metastatic renal cell carcinoma therapy: the impact of oral anticancer agents and immunotherapy.转移性肾细胞癌治疗的成本趋势:口服抗癌药物和免疫疗法的影响。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae067.
3
Cabozantinib use in second or subsequent line of treatment in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of Italian administrative databases.卡博替尼用于肾细胞癌二线或后续治疗:意大利行政数据库分析
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul 3;11:154-160. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2024.2892. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Oral Anticancer Agent (OAA) Adherence and Survival in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC).口服抗癌药物(OAA)在老年转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者中的依从性和生存情况。
Urology. 2022 Oct;168:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
Association between cognitive impairment and oral anticancer agent use in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.认知障碍与老年转移性肾细胞癌患者使用口服抗癌药物的相关性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Aug;70(8):2330-2343. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17826. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Patient, provider, and hospital factors associated with oral anti-neoplastic agent initiation and adherence in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.与老年转移性肾细胞癌患者口服抗肿瘤药物起始治疗和依从性相关的患者、提供者和医院因素。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(5):614-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Patients' Experience of Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of the Impact on Quality of Life.肝细胞癌全身治疗患者的体验:对生活质量影响的综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;14(1):179. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010179.
8
Patterns and Predictors of Oral Anticancer Agent Use in Diverse Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.不同转移性肾细胞癌患者口服抗癌药物的使用模式和预测因素。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):e1895-e1904. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01082. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Systematic Review. Part 1-Overview of Knowledge Discovery Techniques in Artificial Intelligence.药物流行病学中的人工智能:系统评价。第1部分——人工智能中的知识发现技术概述。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1028. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01028. eCollection 2020.
10
Real-World Economic Outcomes During Time on Treatment Among Patients Who Initiated Sunitinib or Pazopanib as First Targeted Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.真实世界中接受舒尼替尼或帕唑帕尼作为晚期肾细胞癌一线靶向治疗的患者在治疗期间的经济学结局:基于医疗保险索赔数据的回顾性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):525-533. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.525.

在美国行政索赔数据库中,晚期肾细胞癌患者使用帕唑帕尼的持续性和依从性。

Persistence and compliance with pazopanib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma within a U.S. administrative claims database.

机构信息

5 Crescent Dr., Philadelphia, PA 19112.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Jun;20(6):603-10. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.6.603.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.6.603
PMID:24856598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

OBJECTIVE

To examine pazopanib persistence and compliance (adherence) and other drug utilization patterns in both treatment-naïve (first-line) patients and those previously treated with RCC therapy in the real-world setting. Key factors affecting persistence and compliance were also explored.

METHODS

This was a retrospective claims analysis using the Truven Health MarketScan Databases to cover claims activity from October 2007 through March 2012. Patients with advanced RCC aged ≥ 18 years who had received pazopanib with 180 days of follow-up were included. Bivariate comparisons of results from first-line and previously treated patients with RCC were conducted. Pazopanib persistence was measured using (a) estimated level of persistence with therapy (ELPT; i.e., the percentage of patients remaining on therapy at 30, 60, and 90 days [patients were censored at 180 days]); (b) time to discontinuation (i.e., duration of therapy); and (c) proportion of days covered (PDC; i.e., the ratio of [total days drug available minus days' supply of last prescription] to [last prescription date minus first prescription date]). Compliance was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR; i.e., the ratio of [total days' supply minus days' supply of last prescription] to [last prescription date minus first prescription date]). Other drug utilization measures included days' supply, time to initiation, time to switching, and dose-related measures. Random forest models were used to explore key factors of pazopanib persistence and compliance.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients met all inclusion criteria; 43.3% were treated with pazopanib first line (first-line cohort), and 56.6% had ≥ 1 prior lines of therapy (previously treated cohort). The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of patients was 62.9 (± 10.3) years, and 71.3% of them were males. Continuous pazopanib therapy for up to 90 days was observed in greater than 50% of patients in both cohorts. In the first-line cohort, ELPT at 30, 60, and 90 days was 98.39%, 70.97%, and 56.45%, respectively; the mean (± SD) number of days to discontinuation was 112.2 (± 62.8); the mean (± SD) PDC was 84.7% (± 16.7%); and the mean (± SD) MPR was 85.2% (± 16.9%). Similar results were observed in the previously treated population: ELPT at 30, 60, and 90 days was 98.77%, 75.31%, and 58.02%, respectively; the mean (± SD) number of days to discontinuation was 118.7 (± 61.4); the mean (± SD) PDC was 87.8% (± 13.5%); and the mean (± SD) MPR was 90.1% (± 13.9%). Differences between the 2 cohorts were not statistically significant. More than 90% of patients in both cohorts had at least a 30-day supply of therapy (91.9% of first-line versus 90.2% of previously treated; P = 0.153). The mean (± SD) time from metastatic diagnosis to start of pazopanib therapy was 104.7 (± 199.3) days in the first-line cohort and 360.9 (± 187.0) days in previously treated patients (P = 0.001). Forty-six patients switched to another therapy: 17 patients in the first-line cohort and 29 patients in the previously treated cohort; the mean (± SD) time to switching therapy from each cohort was 94.7 (± 41.4) days and 87.8 (± 49.6) days (P = 0.146), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed for the starting and ending doses between the 2 cohorts. The average daily dosage of pazopanib was greater than 700 mg in both cohorts (P = 0.055), with a maximum dose of 800 mg. Random forest models demonstrated that younger age and higher comorbidity predicted both higher persistence and compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, greater than 50% of patients with advanced RCC were on pazopanib for almost 4 months, with the majority of both cohorts achieving high persistence and high compliance. Additionally, younger age and higher comorbidity index were the strongest predictors of both greater persistence and compliance. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to validate these findings.

摘要

背景

帕唑帕尼是一种口服酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,在晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者中表现出疗效和耐受性。

目的

在真实环境中检查帕唑帕尼的持续时间和依从性(即药物的使用),以及在初治(一线)患者和先前接受过 RCC 治疗的患者中的其他药物使用模式。还探讨了影响持续时间和依从性的关键因素。

方法

这是一项使用 Truven Health MarketScan 数据库的回顾性索赔分析,涵盖了 2007 年 10 月至 2012 年 3 月的索赔活动。纳入了年龄≥18 岁、接受过帕唑帕尼治疗且有 180 天随访的晚期 RCC 患者。对一线治疗和先前接受过 RCC 治疗的患者进行了结果的双变量比较。使用(a)估计的治疗持续水平(ELPT;即,在 30、60 和 90 天(患者在 180 天时被截尾)仍在接受治疗的患者比例);(b)停药时间(即治疗持续时间);和(c)比例的天数覆盖(PDC;即[总药物可用天数减去最后处方的天数供应]与[最后处方日期减去第一处方日期]的比值)来衡量帕唑帕尼的持续时间。通过药物占有比例(MPR;即[总供应天数减去最后处方的天数供应]与[最后处方日期减去第一处方日期]的比值)来衡量依从性。其他药物使用措施包括天的供应、起始时间、切换时间和剂量相关措施。随机森林模型用于探索帕唑帕尼持续时间和依从性的关键因素。

结果

共有 143 名患者符合所有纳入标准;43.3%的患者一线接受帕唑帕尼治疗(一线队列),56.6%的患者有≥1线既往治疗(既往治疗队列)。患者的平均(±标准偏差[SD])年龄为 62.9(±10.3)岁,其中 71.3%为男性。在两个队列中,均观察到超过 50%的患者连续接受帕唑帕尼治疗长达 90 天。在一线队列中,ELPT 在 30、60 和 90 天分别为 98.39%、70.97%和 56.45%;平均(±SD)停药天数为 112.2(±62.8);平均(±SD)PDC 为 84.7%(±16.7%);平均(±SD)MPR 为 85.2%(±16.9%)。在既往治疗人群中也观察到类似的结果:ELPT 在 30、60 和 90 天分别为 98.77%、75.31%和 58.02%;平均(±SD)停药天数为 118.7(±61.4);平均(±SD)PDC 为 87.8%(±13.5%);平均(±SD)MPR 为 90.1%(±13.9%)。两个队列之间的差异无统计学意义。两个队列中均有超过 90%的患者至少有 30 天的治疗供应(一线队列为 91.9%,既往治疗队列为 90.2%;P=0.153)。一线队列中从转移性诊断到开始帕唑帕尼治疗的平均(±SD)时间为 104.7(±199.3)天,而既往治疗队列为 360.9(±187.0)天(P=0.001)。有 46 名患者转为其他治疗:一线队列中有 17 名患者,既往治疗队列中有 29 名患者;从每个队列开始转换治疗的平均(±SD)时间分别为 94.7(±41.4)天和 87.8(±49.6)天(P=0.146)。两个队列之间的起始和结束剂量均有统计学显著差异。两个队列中帕唑帕尼的平均日剂量均大于 700 mg(P=0.055),最大剂量为 800 mg。随机森林模型表明,年龄较小和合并症较高预测了较高的持续性和依从性。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,超过 50%的晚期 RCC 患者接受了帕唑帕尼治疗,持续时间接近 4 个月,大多数患者的持续性和依从性均较高。此外,年龄较小和较高的合并症指数是预测更高持续性和依从性的最强因素。需要更大的队列和更长的随访时间来验证这些发现。