Mandrekar Sumithra J
From the Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e107-10. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e107.
The primary goal of phase I dose-finding trials has been historically to understand the safety profile of a new treatment/regimen and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further investigation in a specific tumor type. These designs hinged on the assumption that the highest safe dose is also likely to be the most efficacious dose. In the current era of stratified medicine and targeted therapies, these assumptions and designs are quickly becoming obsolete. Newer approaches to dose-finding designs are emerging with a focus on not just safety, but also an efficacy (clinical- or biomarker-based) measure to guide the determination of the "optimal" dose (not necessarily the MTD) model, as opposed to rule-based designs. These designs allow for flexibility in trial conduct, with improved precision in estimating the dose to take forward for further testing, patient selection/enrichment strategies to maximize the chance of therapeutic effect, and expansion cohorts to further understand the safety/efficacy of the agent and patient subsets most likely to benefit from the agent under investigation. Although advances in technology have enabled the possibility of using these newer approaches, the acceptance and integration of these approaches in practice can only be accelerated if it is developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.
从历史上看,I期剂量探索试验的主要目标是了解新治疗方法/方案的安全性概况,并确定最大耐受剂量(MTD),以便在特定肿瘤类型中进行进一步研究。这些设计基于这样一种假设,即最高安全剂量也可能是最有效剂量。在分层医学和靶向治疗的当前时代,这些假设和设计正迅速过时。新的剂量探索设计方法正在出现,其重点不仅在于安全性,还在于一种疗效(基于临床或生物标志物)测量方法,以指导“最佳”剂量(不一定是MTD)模型的确定,这与基于规则的设计不同。这些设计在试验实施中具有灵活性,在估计推进进一步测试的剂量时具有更高的精度,采用患者选择/富集策略以最大化治疗效果的机会,并设立扩展队列以进一步了解药物的安全性/疗效以及最有可能从所研究药物中受益的患者亚组。尽管技术进步使得使用这些新方法成为可能,但只有在与临床范式协同发展的情况下,这些方法在实践中的接受和整合才能加速。