Yin Jun, Paoletti Xavier, Sargent Daniel J, Mandrekar Sumithra J
1 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
2 Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, INSERM CESP, OncoStat, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;14(6):611-620. doi: 10.1177/1740774517723829. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Phase I trials are designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose of therapeutic agents for subsequent testing. The dose-finding paradigm has thus traditionally focused on identifying the maximum tolerable dose of an agent or combination therapy under the assumption that there is a non-decreasing relationship between dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy. The dose is typically determined based on the probability of severe toxicity observed during the first treatment cycle. A novel endpoint, the total toxicity profile, was previously developed to account for the multiple toxicity types and grades experienced in the first cycle. More recently, this was extended to a repeated measures design based on the total toxicity profile to account for longitudinal toxicities over multiple treatment cycles in the absence of within-patient correlation.
In this work, we propose to extend the design in the presence of within-patient correlation. Furthermore, we provide a framework to detect a toxicity time trend (toxicity increasing, decreasing, or stable) over multiple treatment cycles. We utilize a linear mixed model in the Bayesian framework, with the addition of Bayesian risk functions for decision-making in dose assignment.
The performance of this design was evaluated using simulation studies and real data from a phase I trial. We demonstrated that using available toxicity data from all cycles of treatment improves the accuracy of maximum tolerated dose identification and allows for the detection of a time trend. The performance is consistent regardless of the strength of the within-patient correlation. In addition, the use of a quasi-continuous total toxicity profile score significantly increased the power to detect time trends compared to when binary data only were used.
The increased interest in molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies in oncology necessitates innovative phase I study designs. Our proposed framework provides a tool to tackle some of the challenges presented by these novel agents, specifically through the ability to understand patterns of toxicity over time, which is important in the cases of cumulative or late toxicities.
I期试验旨在确定治疗药物的安全性、耐受性以及推荐的II期剂量以便后续试验。因此,传统的剂量探索模式一直专注于确定一种药物或联合疗法的最大耐受剂量,其假设是剂量-毒性与剂量-疗效之间存在非递减关系。剂量通常根据首个治疗周期中观察到的严重毒性概率来确定。此前开发了一种新的终点指标——总毒性概况,以考虑首个周期中经历的多种毒性类型和等级。最近,这一指标扩展为基于总毒性概况的重复测量设计,以考虑多个治疗周期中的纵向毒性,前提是患者内部不存在相关性。
在这项研究中,我们建议在存在患者内部相关性的情况下扩展该设计。此外,我们提供了一个框架来检测多个治疗周期中的毒性时间趋势(毒性增加、减少或稳定)。我们在贝叶斯框架中使用线性混合模型,并添加贝叶斯风险函数用于剂量分配决策。
使用模拟研究和一项I期试验的真实数据对该设计的性能进行了评估。我们证明,使用所有治疗周期的可用毒性数据可提高最大耐受剂量识别的准确性,并能检测时间趋势。无论患者内部相关性的强度如何,该性能都是一致的。此外,与仅使用二元数据相比,使用准连续的总毒性概况评分显著提高了检测时间趋势的效能。
肿瘤学中对分子靶向药物和免疫疗法的兴趣日益增加,这就需要创新的I期研究设计。我们提出的框架提供了一种工具,以应对这些新型药物带来的一些挑战,特别是通过了解毒性随时间变化的模式的能力,这在累积毒性或迟发性毒性的情况下很重要。