Jonkman Nini H, Westland Heleen, Trappenburg Jaap C A, Groenwold Rolf H H, Effing-Tijdhof Tanja W, Troosters Thierry, van der Palen Job, Bourbeau Jean, Jaarsma Tiny, Hoes Arno W, Schuurmans Marieke J
Department of Rehabilitation, Nursing Science and Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2014 May 23;4(5):e005220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005220.
Self-management interventions in patients with chronic conditions have received increasing attention over the past few years, yet the meta-analyses encountered considerable heterogeneity in results. This suggests that the effectiveness of self-management interventions must be assessed in the context of which components are responsible for eliciting the effect and in which subgroups of patients the intervention works best. The aim of the present study is to identify condition-transcending determinants of success of self-management interventions in two parallel individual patient data meta-analyses of self-management trials in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Investigators of 53 randomised trials (32 in CHF and 21 in COPD) will be requested to share their de-identified individual patient data. Data will be analysed using random effects models, taking clustering within studies into account. Effect modification by age, sex, disease severity, symptom status, comorbid conditions and level of education will be assessed. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.
The de-identified individual patient data are used only for the purpose for which they were originally collected and for which ethical approval has been obtained by the original investigators. Knowledge on the effective ingredients of self-management programmes and identification of subgroups of patients in which those interventions are most effective will guide the development of evidence-based personalised self-management interventions for patients with CHF and COPD as well as with other chronic diseases.
CRD42013004698.
在过去几年中,慢性病患者的自我管理干预措施受到了越来越多的关注,但荟萃分析的结果存在相当大的异质性。这表明,必须在确定哪些组成部分会引发效果以及干预措施对哪些患者亚组效果最佳的背景下评估自我管理干预措施的有效性。本研究的目的是在两项平行的个体患者数据荟萃分析中,确定充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者自我管理试验成功的超越疾病的决定因素。
将要求53项随机试验(32项针对CHF,21项针对COPD)的研究者分享其去识别化的个体患者数据。将使用随机效应模型进行数据分析,并考虑研究中的聚类情况。将评估年龄、性别、疾病严重程度、症状状态、合并症和教育水平对效果的修饰作用。将进行敏感性分析以评估研究结果的稳健性。
去识别化的个体患者数据仅用于其最初收集的目的,并且原始研究者已获得伦理批准。关于自我管理计划有效成分的知识以及确定那些干预措施最有效的患者亚组,将指导为CHF和COPD患者以及其他慢性病患者制定基于证据的个性化自我管理干预措施。
PROSPERO:CRD42013004698。