• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在个体参与者数据的荟萃分析中,使用多重填补法处理系统性缺失的混杂因素。

Multiple imputation for handling systematically missing confounders in meta-analysis of individual participant data.

作者信息

Resche-Rigon Matthieu, White Ian R, Bartlett Jonathan W, Peters Sanne A E, Thompson Simon G

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.; DBIM, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; Inserm UMRS 717, Paris, France.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2013 Dec 10;32(28):4890-905. doi: 10.1002/sim.5894. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5894
PMID:23857554
Abstract

A variable is 'systematically missing' if it is missing for all individuals within particular studies in an individual participant data meta-analysis. When a systematically missing variable is a potential confounder in observational epidemiology, standard methods either fail to adjust the exposure-disease association for the potential confounder or exclude studies where it is missing. We propose a new approach to adjust for systematically missing confounders based on multiple imputation by chained equations. Systematically missing data are imputed via multilevel regression models that allow for heterogeneity between studies. A simulation study compares various choices of imputation model. An illustration is given using data from eight studies estimating the association between carotid intima media thickness and subsequent risk of cardiovascular events. Results are compared with standard methods and also with an extension of a published method that exploits the relationship between fully adjusted and partially adjusted estimated effects through a multivariate random effects meta-analysis model. We conclude that multiple imputation provides a practicable approach that can handle arbitrary patterns of systematic missingness. Bias is reduced by including sufficient between-study random effects in the imputation model.

摘要

在个体参与者数据荟萃分析中,如果某个变量在特定研究中的所有个体中均缺失,则该变量为“系统性缺失”。当系统性缺失变量在观察性流行病学中是潜在混杂因素时,标准方法要么无法针对潜在混杂因素调整暴露-疾病关联,要么排除该变量缺失的研究。我们提出了一种基于链式方程多重填补法来调整系统性缺失混杂因素的新方法。系统性缺失数据通过允许研究间存在异质性的多水平回归模型进行填补。一项模拟研究比较了填补模型的各种选择。使用八项研究的数据进行了实例说明,这些研究估计了颈动脉内膜中层厚度与随后心血管事件风险之间的关联。将结果与标准方法以及一种已发表方法的扩展进行了比较,该扩展方法通过多变量随机效应荟萃分析模型利用完全调整和部分调整估计效应之间的关系。我们得出结论,多重填补提供了一种可行的方法,能够处理系统性缺失的任意模式。通过在填补模型中纳入足够的研究间随机效应可减少偏差。

相似文献

1
Multiple imputation for handling systematically missing confounders in meta-analysis of individual participant data.在个体参与者数据的荟萃分析中,使用多重填补法处理系统性缺失的混杂因素。
Stat Med. 2013 Dec 10;32(28):4890-905. doi: 10.1002/sim.5894. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
2
Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data.多水平数据系统缺失和随机缺失的链方程多重插补法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1634-1649. doi: 10.1177/0962280216666564. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
3
Imputation of systematically missing predictors in an individual participant data meta-analysis: a generalized approach using MICE.个体参与者数据荟萃分析中系统性缺失预测变量的插补:一种使用MICE的通用方法
Stat Med. 2015 May 20;34(11):1841-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.6451. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
4
Hierarchical imputation of systematically and sporadically missing data: An approximate Bayesian approach using chained equations.系统和偶发性缺失数据的分层插补:一种使用链式方程的近似贝叶斯方法。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):333-351. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600220. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
5
Combining multiple imputation and meta-analysis with individual participant data.结合多重插补和个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2013 Nov 20;32(26):4499-514. doi: 10.1002/sim.5844. Epub 2013 May 24.
6
A comparison of existing methods for multiple imputation in individual participant data meta-analysis.个体参与者数据荟萃分析中多重填补现有方法的比较。
Stat Med. 2017 Sep 30;36(22):3507-3532. doi: 10.1002/sim.7388. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.采用多重插补处理估计相对危险度时丢失的结局数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5.
8
Multiple imputation for systematically missing confounders within a distributed data drug safety network: A simulation study and real-world example.在分布式数据药物安全网络中针对系统缺失混杂因素进行多重插补:一项模拟研究和真实世界的实例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Jan;29 Suppl 1:35-44. doi: 10.1002/pds.4876. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.不同方法在倾向评分分析中处理缺失数据的比较。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;34(1):23-36. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0447-z. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
10
Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.带有缺失数据指标的多重插补。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Dec;30(12):2685-2700. doi: 10.1177/09622802211047346. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple imputation for systematically missing effect modifiers in individual participant data meta-analysis.个体参与者数据荟萃分析中系统缺失效应修饰因素的多重填补法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Aug;34(8):1590-1604. doi: 10.1177/09622802251348800. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
2
Application of causal inference methods in individual-participant data meta-analyses in medicine: addressing data handling and reporting gaps with new proposed reporting guidelines.因果推理方法在医学个体参与者数据荟萃分析中的应用:通过新提出的报告指南解决数据处理和报告差距。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02210-9.
3
Multiple imputation of systematically missing data on gait speed in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care.
系统缺失步态速度数据的多重插补:来自瑞典老龄化和护理研究
Aging (Albany NY). 2024 Feb 14;16(4):3056-3067. doi: 10.18632/aging.205552.
4
Sensitivity analysis for the interactive effects of internal bias and publication bias in meta-analyses.Meta 分析中内部偏倚和发表偏倚交互作用的敏感性分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 Jan;15(1):21-43. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1667. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
5
Systematically missing data in causally interpretable meta-analysis.因果可解释的荟萃分析中系统性缺失的数据。
Biostatistics. 2024 Apr 15;25(2):289-305. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad006.
6
Practical strategies for operationalizing optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.实用策略:在基于分层群集的结果依赖抽样设计中实现最佳分配。
Stat Med. 2023 Mar 30;42(7):917-935. doi: 10.1002/sim.9650. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Predicting 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases; an international study including biomarkers and perioperative treatment.预测结直肠肝转移切除术后 10 年生存率:一项包含生物标志物和围手术期治疗的国际研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jun;168:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
8
Development of the ADFICE_IT Models for Predicting Falls and Recurrent Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Pooled Analyses of European Cohorts With Special Attention to Medication.ADFICE_IT 模型在预测社区居住的老年人跌倒和复发性跌倒中的开发:对特别关注药物的欧洲队列进行的汇总分析。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jul 5;77(7):1446-1454. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac080.
9
Methods to Address Confounding and Other Biases in Meta-Analyses: Review and Recommendations.解决荟萃分析中混杂和其他偏倚的方法:综述与建议。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:19-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-114020. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
Reading, Conducting, and Developing Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses in Psychiatry for Treatment Issues.阅读、开展及撰写关于精神病学治疗问题的系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 29;12:644980. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.644980. eCollection 2021.