Suppr超能文献

英国成人行为体重管理干预措施的参与度和效果是否存在差异?一项个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的方案。

Are there inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions for adults in the UK? Protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 23;13(3):e067607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067607.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is important to identify whether behavioural weight management interventions work well across different groups in the population so health inequalities in obesity are not widened. Previous systematic reviews of inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight management interventions have been limited because few trials report relevant analyses and heterogeneity in the categorisation of inequality characteristics prevents meta-analysis. An individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) allows us to reanalyse all trials with available data in a uniform way. We aim to conduct an IPD meta-analysis of UK randomised controlled trials to examine whether there are inequalities in the attendance and effectiveness of behavioural weight interventions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In a recently published systematic review, we identified 17 UK-based randomised controlled trials of primary care-relevant behavioural interventions, conducted in adults living with overweight or obesity and reporting weight outcomes at baseline and 1-year follow-up. The corresponding author of each trial will be invited to contribute data to the IPD-MA. The outcomes of interest are weight at 12-months and intervention attendance (number of sessions offered vs number of sessions attended). We will primarily consider whether there is an interaction between intervention group and characteristics where inequalities occur, such as by gender/sex, socioeconomic status or age. The IPD-MA will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of IPD guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No further ethical approval was required as ethical approval for each individual study was obtained by the original trial investigators from appropriate ethics committees. The completed IPD-MA will be disseminated at conferences, in a peer-reviewed journal and contribute to the lead author's PhD thesis. Investigators of each individual study included in the final IPD-MA will be invited to collaborate on any publications that arise from the project.

摘要

简介

确定行为体重管理干预措施在人群中的不同群体中是否有效非常重要,这样才能避免肥胖相关的健康不平等问题进一步扩大。先前关于行为体重管理干预措施的参与和效果不平等的系统评价受到限制,因为很少有试验报告相关分析,并且不平等特征的分类异质性也阻止了荟萃分析的进行。个体参与者数据荟萃分析(IPD-MA)允许我们以统一的方式重新分析所有具有可用数据的试验。我们旨在对英国随机对照试验进行 IPD-MA,以检验行为干预措施的参与和效果是否存在差异。

方法和分析

在最近发表的一项系统评价中,我们确定了 17 项英国基于初级保健的行为干预随机对照试验,这些试验针对超重或肥胖的成年人进行,报告了基线和 1 年随访时的体重结果。我们将邀请每项试验的主要作者为 IPD-MA 提供数据。感兴趣的结果是 12 个月时的体重和干预参与度(提供的课程数量与参加的课程数量)。我们将主要考虑干预组与出现不平等现象的特征(如性别/性别、社会经济地位或年龄)之间是否存在交互作用。IPD-MA 将按照系统评价和 IPD 荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行。

伦理和传播

由于每个单独研究的原始试验调查人员已从适当的伦理委员会获得了每个单独研究的伦理批准,因此不需要进一步的伦理批准。完成的 IPD-MA 将在会议上、同行评审期刊上发表,并为主要作者的博士论文做出贡献。将邀请参与最终 IPD-MA 的每个单独研究的调查人员合作撰写任何由此项目产生的出版物。

相似文献

9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验