• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康研究中理想的起源与影响:来自U-CARE研究环境的经验

The Origin and Impact of Ideals in eHealth Research: Experiences From the U-CARE Research Environment.

作者信息

Sjöström Jonas, von Essen Louise, Grönqvist Helena

机构信息

U-CARE, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 May 23;3(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3202.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.3202
PMID:24860071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4051743/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of information technology (IT) in society is a foundation for new modes of interaction between patients and health specialists. IT plays an important role in the renewal of care. Several countries have incorporated eHealth plans into their national health strategies. Part of the eHealth evolution concerns Internet psychological treatment and psychosocial care. These interventions are complex to design and evaluate due to legal, ethical, organizational, technical, and methodological challenges.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to seek to make explicit contributions to the understanding of ideals in eHealth research, and illuminate their implications for establishing an effective research environment. Our analysis draws from three years of experience in establishing an eHealth research environment, and the literature.

METHODS

We worked inductively to characterize challenging research ideals, and their origins, in our environment. Thereafter, we made a selective search of the literature to scrutinize and illuminate each ideal and it's implications.

RESULTS

In this work, we propose a structured approach to address ideals in eHealth research. The scrutinized ideals are accountability, innovation, rigor, relevance, and sustainability. The approach supports researchers to systematically understand the ideals, their origin, and to manage their implications within an eHealth research environment.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of eHealth research causes a need for sustainable, multi-disciplinary research environments. There is a need for a structured approach to organize eHealth research. The proposed approach helps to systematically scrutinize ideals, thus promoting high quality research.

摘要

背景

信息技术在社会中的普及是患者与健康专家之间新型互动模式的基础。信息技术在医疗服务的更新中发挥着重要作用。一些国家已将电子健康计划纳入其国家卫生战略。电子健康发展的一部分涉及互联网心理治疗和心理社会护理。由于法律、伦理、组织、技术和方法等方面的挑战,这些干预措施的设计和评估很复杂。

目的

我们研究的目的是力求对理解电子健康研究中的理想情况做出明确贡献,并阐明其对建立有效研究环境的影响。我们的分析借鉴了建立电子健康研究环境三年的经验以及相关文献。

方法

我们通过归纳法来描述我们环境中具有挑战性的研究理想情况及其来源。此后,我们对文献进行了选择性检索,以审视和阐明每个理想情况及其影响。

结果

在这项工作中,我们提出了一种结构化方法来处理电子健康研究中的理想情况。经过审视的理想情况包括问责制、创新性、严谨性、相关性和可持续性。该方法支持研究人员系统地理解这些理想情况、其来源,并在电子健康研究环境中管理其影响。

结论

电子健康研究的复杂性导致需要可持续的多学科研究环境。需要一种结构化方法来组织电子健康研究。所提出的方法有助于系统地审视理想情况,从而促进高质量研究。

相似文献

1
The Origin and Impact of Ideals in eHealth Research: Experiences From the U-CARE Research Environment.电子健康研究中理想的起源与影响:来自U-CARE研究环境的经验
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 May 23;3(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3202.
2
eHealth Technologies, Multimorbidity, and the Office Visit: Qualitative Interview Study on the Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses.电子健康技术、多重疾病与门诊诊疗:关于医生和护士观点的定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 26;20(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8983.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies.一个用于提高电子健康技术的采用率和影响力的整体框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 5;13(4):e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672.
5
Experiences from using eHealth in contact with health care among older adults with cognitive impairment.认知障碍老年人在与医疗保健接触中使用电子健康的经验。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Jun;33(2):380-389. doi: 10.1111/scs.12634. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history.为何国家电子健康计划需要死去的哲学家:维特根斯坦式反思政策制定者不愿从历史中吸取教训。
Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):533-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00642.x.
7
Commentary: pediatric eHealth interventions: common challenges during development, implementation, and dissemination.评论:儿科电子健康干预措施:开发、实施和传播过程中的常见挑战
J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Jul;39(6):612-23. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu022. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
The Impact of an eHealth Portal on Health Care Professionals' Interaction with Patients: Qualitative Study.一个电子健康门户网站对医疗保健专业人员与患者互动的影响:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 24;17(11):e267. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4950.
10
Dropout From an eHealth Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.针对2型糖尿病成人患者的电子健康干预中的退出情况:一项定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7479.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Depression: A Systematic Review.冠状动脉疾病合并抑郁症患者的认知行为疗法:一项系统评价
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025 Feb;22(1):19-39. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250103.
2
Internet-based support for informal caregivers to individuals with head and neck cancer (Carer eSupport): a study protocol for the development and feasibility testing of a complex online intervention.基于互联网的头颈部癌症患者非正式照护者支持(Carer eSupport):一项复杂在线干预措施的开发和可行性测试研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 27;12(5):e057442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057442.
3
Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey.参与一项基于互联网指导的认知行为疗法(CBT)干预父母的单臂可行性试验(ENGAGE)的退出率和不参与原因:一项嵌套的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e056758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758.
4
Conducting Digital Health Care Research: Document Analysis of Challenges Experienced During Intervention Development and Feasibility Study Setup of an Internet-Administered Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer.开展数字医疗保健研究:对一项针对癌症患儿家长的互联网管理干预措施在干预开发和可行性研究设置过程中所面临挑战的文献分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 8;5(10):e26266. doi: 10.2196/26266.
5
eHealth interventions to facilitate work participation: a scoping review.电子健康干预措施促进工作参与:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Oct;19(10):2739-2759. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00433.
6
Internet-Administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Common Mental Health Difficulties in Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Intervention Development and Description Study.针对癌症患儿家长常见心理健康问题的互联网认知行为疗法:干预开发与描述性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 22;5(7):e22709. doi: 10.2196/22709.
7
Commencement of and Retention in Web-Based Interventions and Response to Prompts and Reminders: Longitudinal Observational Study Based on Two Randomized Controlled Trials.基于两项随机对照试验的纵向观察研究:基于网络的干预措施的启动和保留以及对提示和提醒的反应。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e24590. doi: 10.2196/24590.
8
Views of Implementers and Nonimplementers of Internet-Administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety: Survey of Primary Care Decision Makers in Sweden.互联网管理的认知行为疗法在抑郁和焦虑中的实施者和未实施者的观点:瑞典初级保健决策者的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 12;22(8):e18033. doi: 10.2196/18033.
9
User Experiences of an Internet-Based Stepped-Care Intervention for Individuals With Cancer and Concurrent Symptoms of Anxiety or Depression (the U-CARE AdultCan Trial): Qualitative Study.针对患有癌症且伴有焦虑或抑郁并发症状的个体的基于互联网的逐步护理干预措施的用户体验(U-CARE AdultCan试验):定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e16604. doi: 10.2196/16604.
10
Experiences of Internet-Based Stepped Care in Individuals With Cancer and Concurrent Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: Qualitative Exploration Conducted Alongside the U-CARE AdultCan Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症患者及同时伴有焦虑和抑郁症状者基于互联网的逐步照护体验:在U-CARE AdultCan随机对照试验期间进行的定性探索
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 30;22(3):e16547. doi: 10.2196/16547.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing guidelines for executing and reporting Internet intervention research.制定互联网干预研究的实施和报告指南。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(2):82-97. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.573807.
2
Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长期癌症幸存者与配偶和健康对照者相比的抑郁和焦虑:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):721-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70244-4. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
3
An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice.证据整合三角模型,用于使科学、政策和实践保持一致。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.016.
4
Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: a meta-analysis.美国慢性病治疗中的抑郁与药物依从性:一项荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1175-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1704-y. Epub 2011 May 1.
5
Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of internet-based treatment for adults with depressive symptoms: randomized trial.针对有抑郁症状成年人的基于互联网治疗的成本效用和成本效益:随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1436.
6
Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.指导性自助与面对面心理治疗对抑郁和焦虑障碍哪个更有效?一项比较疗效研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2010 Dec;40(12):1943-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000772. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
7
Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.利用互联网促进健康行为改变:对理论基础、行为改变技术的应用以及传播方式对效果影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Feb 17;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
8
Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations.互联网干预措施的成本效益:综述与建议。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):40-5. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6.
9
The longitudinal effects of depression on physical activity.抑郁症对身体活动的纵向影响。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Aug;31(4):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 13.
10
A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers.实用-解释性连续统指标总结(PRECIS):一种帮助试验设计者的工具。
CMAJ. 2009 May 12;180(10):E47-57. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090523. Epub 2009 Apr 16.